Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat1242@ispwest.com: 247 ]

Total 247 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:04:59 -0700
_________________________________________________ Learn to use your killfile. There are a number of people who are not finished, thank you. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01116.html (9,370 bytes)

62. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 19:19:10 -0700
_________________________________________________ You guys are wearing me out here, but let me say it one more time: I don't want to reduce security. I want the security processing to occur at the AR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01121.html (9,791 bytes)

63. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 12:01:48 -0700
_________________________________________________ It isn't the registration I find annoying, it's the signing and uploading. Wouldn't password login be secure if the ARRL issued the password with the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01139.html (11,022 bytes)

64. Re: [CQ-Contest] e qsl (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 15:53:16 -0700
You apparently have never had YOUR call busted by a once-in-a-lifetime DXpedition. If I am the DX station and I get your QSL card with time, date, mode and band right and the call off by one letter,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00020.html (9,471 bytes)

65. Re: [CQ-Contest] e qsl (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 18:58:09 -0700
He's probably got enough beer. Buy him a bigger antenna. :-) -- Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________________________ Original Message: _________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00023.html (9,280 bytes)

66. Re: [CQ-Contest] e qsl (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 07:15:51 -0700
What counts as close? Two things are required, IMO: 1. I am convinced the QSO did take place (correct time, date, band and mode) -and2. The mistake in copying the call was mine, and no fault of the o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00030.html (9,848 bytes)

67. Re: [CQ-Contest] e qsl (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 10:01:28 -0700
I understand your point of view Mal, and I respect your desire for maximum integrity of logs. Where we differ is on what constitutes a valid log entry. As I see it, a log with an invalid call sign is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00033.html (10,913 bytes)

68. Re: [CQ-Contest] e QSL (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 19:01:31 -0700
Please allow me to clarify one point. I don't want LoTW to do the "correcting" of logs. If LoTW says no match, there is no match. What I DO want is for individuals to submit a corrected log to LoTW w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00042.html (10,057 bytes)

69. Re: [CQ-Contest] e QSL (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 16:21:10 -0700
That's funny! I picked the call purely out of thin air. You made my day. :-) -- Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________________________ Original Message: _________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00045.html (9,927 bytes)

70. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest Prizes (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 08:15:57 -0700
______________________________________________________________ In those BBQ contests, etc, the playing field is perfectly level and the outcome depends only on the skill and knowledge of the cook. Ho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00232.html (8,370 bytes)

71. [RTTY] W6WRT VOLTA score SOABHP (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 04:43:24 -0700
A puny effort due to work schedule, but fun while it lasted. Pretty poor condx - the NCDXC beacons on 14.100 normally are quite strong here, but this time only 4U1UN was audible at all, and then only
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00267.html (7,547 bytes)

72. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dayton soon to be world's #2 hamfest (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:32:43 -0700
_________________________________________________ Sunspots are down even more. Don't forget to factor that in, since it greatly affects ham activity in general. -- Bill, W6WRT _______________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00161.html (7,741 bytes)

73. Re: [CQ-Contest] ICOM-amp. keying (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 14:37:10 -0700
_________________________________________________ The amplifier relay in the '746PRO is very wimpy indeed. Use a transistor switch for sure. Don't ask how I found this out. ;-) Luckily it was under w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00162.html (8,723 bytes)

74. Re: [CQ-Contest] ICOM-amp. keying (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:59:44 -0700
_________________________________________________ One can only wonder why Icom used a relay in the first place. A big honkin' FET would have been cheaper and more reliable. -- Bill, W6WRT ___________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00168.html (8,531 bytes)

75. Re: [CQ-Contest] Inverted V (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 09:33:26 -0800
___________________________________________________________ Have we forgotten about loading coils? -- Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00037.html (9,901 bytes)

76. Re: [RTTY] CW/RTTY QRM Saturday evening (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 08:13:20 -0800
___________________________________________________________ Given the EU allocation for RTTY at 7035-7045, that is where you are likely to hear the US stations operating. Above and below that should
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00107.html (8,350 bytes)

77. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: [RTTY] CW/RTTY QRM Saturday evening (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 16:29:49 -0800
___________________________________________________________ No problem for the CW guys, you mean. I was jammed at least five times on different frequencies operating RTTY. The method was so similar i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00138.html (9,111 bytes)

78. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: [RTTY] CW/RTTY QRM Saturday evening (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 17:49:41 -0800
___________________________________________________________ I didn't say it was. I doubt that a serious CW contester would waste his time. It's purely a CW vs RTTY thing. I've gotten similar jamming
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00140.html (9,222 bytes)

79. Re: [CQ-Contest] How frequent to ID? Every QSO? No way! (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:19:11 -0800
That post should be required reading for all contesters. Just when I think I understand all the subtleties of contesting, I find I don't. -- Bill, W6WRT ______________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00249.html (9,594 bytes)

80. [RTTY] A little LoTW gotcha (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:20:44 -0800
Did any of you know that your LoTW certificates have to be renewed every year? I found out the hard way last night after trying to upload my XE RTTY log. The program continually crashed for no appare
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-02/msg00083.html (9,008 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]
This search system is powered by Namazu