Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:df3kv@t-online.de: 113 ]

Total 113 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m "new" approach to staying in the band? (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 04:01:04 +0100
Hi Mark, That is exactly what I wanted to point out. Working LSB on 7125.5 or USB on 14.150.5 makes your transmission illegal. During the recent WWDX many stations were operating outside their freque
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00164.html (9,605 bytes)

82. Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m "new" approach to staying in the band? (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 19:38:57 +0100
Transmitting on a trx readout of 14.150.5 with 2.7kHz bandwidth in USB means that the transmitted signals appears from about 14.150.5 to 14.153.2. The LSB signal stays well within the band limit and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00173.html (11,656 bytes)

83. Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m "new" approach to staying in the band? (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 00:28:49 +0100
Excuse me, please read "an LSB signal..." 73 Peter --Original Message-- An USB signal on 14150.0 is already completely out of band! _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00179.html (8,851 bytes)

84. Re: [CQ-Contest] 40m "new" approach to staying in the band? (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:57:49 +0100
Hi Andy, That ?actually? probably means your transmitter. I canīt send send anything higher then 2.4kHz and lower then 130Hz with my Icom IC-740. But I could transmit a 2.7kHz band width by using my
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00186.html (9,049 bytes)

85. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules? (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:57:44 +0100
Sure, a decent antenna and 100W beat 4KW into a GP easily 73 Peter --Original Message-- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Zoltan Szoke Se
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00342.html (9,498 bytes)

86. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking with mismatched bands (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:55:21 +0100
Sure, you should be penalized. The signal report i.e. in CQWW is an important part in that contest: IV. NUMBER EXCHANGE: Phone: RS report plus zone (i.e., 5705). CW: RST report plus zone (i.e., 57905
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00080.html (9,159 bytes)

87. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW CC Update (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 22:46:03 +0100
DARC: any contest JARL; ALL ASIAN and JIDXC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00268.html (8,174 bytes)

88. Re: [CQ-Contest] RDXC 24 hours M/M (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 00:34:51 +0200
You just have to make sure the other operator logged what you transmitted 73 Peter I have no control over what is logged by the other oper. The discussion on this rule and the RDXC rules in general i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00060.html (7,766 bytes)

89. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:58:53 +0200
You are right Henk, but somebody mentioned it as a new "DX cluster" experience for contesters. Probably the next step will be the bundling of all web radios worldwide and streaming that it into the I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00133.html (9,987 bytes)

90. Re: [CQ-Contest] A new "DX cluster" experience for contesters (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 01:20:10 +0200
You guessed wrong. To become a better operator you just need to find the stations you like to work without assistance 73 Peter I guess in order to get my "better" operator status back, I need to brin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00243.html (10,737 bytes)

91. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best callsign letters (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:08:26 +0200
Donīt do that. Using no standard spelling causes even more confusion 73 Peter --Original Message-- From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Tom
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00310.html (8,330 bytes)

92. Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of CW decoders in contests - a contrarian opinion (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 00:16:38 +0200
Then everybody has to use the same antenna setup as well (like in WRTC). But location is not levelled then either. 73 Peter I am all for doing EVERYTHING possible to increase participation. But I am
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-05/msg00240.html (8,073 bytes)

93. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU 2009 and 2010 and ???? (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 19:11:55 +0200
What I see as one possible reason for all that trouble is the fact that the rules for the IARU WM do not clearly show what is just hidden in the ARRL contest rules: Extract: 3.3. An operator may not
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00190.html (9,599 bytes)

94. Re: [CQ-Contest] New FTDX5000 (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2010 03:32:32 +0200
Hi Art, The Mai 2010 test report by RadCom magazine conducted by Peter Hart, G3SJX shows top of the line performance. 2-tone dynamic range at 2kHz spacing was measured at 109db and 104db at 500Hz spa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-06/msg00278.html (8,094 bytes)

95. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU HF Contest (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 14:44:59 +0200
That only applies to paper logs and when qso points are claimed for the dupes 73 Peter Rule 13.2.3 states that:- A 3 QSO reduction will be assessed for each duplicate QSO found during log checking or
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00058.html (7,852 bytes)

96. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cheating (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:31:39 +0200
I heard spotted WRTC stations without callers 73 Peter Not true - I heard several calling CQ and not getting callers. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00162.html (7,183 bytes)

97. Re: [CQ-Contest] List of WRTC stations / Results /Overspotting, and its impact (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:52:57 +0200
It would be much more fun and competition for everybody if the cluster would not exist at all. But I think the good old times without mouse click qsos are gone and will not return. 73 Peter However f
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00239.html (8,792 bytes)

98. Re: [CQ-Contest] N6TJ AXIOMS OF LIFE (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:30:51 +0200
I was aware of that from the beginning and still donīt like it 73 Peter We kept our heads in sand about DX Cluster for 25 years and now comes surprise about some bad side effects. ___________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00304.html (8,139 bytes)

99. Re: [CQ-Contest] Upcoming: 56th WAEDC CW (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 23:45:26 +0200
Give them away anytime somebody asks for them. Some "serious" stations run 100W only and donīt expect high qso counts. For them the QTCs are even more valuable. Keeping them until late in the contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00089.html (9,871 bytes)

100. Re: [CQ-Contest] "QTC?" (score: 1)
Author: "DF3KV" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 00:36:41 +0200
It will be not more frustrating then waiting for the identification of another dx station while doing s&p. Advantage is, you know already the call sign and that it takes one more minute of waiting fo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00109.html (8,613 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu