Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dl3bqa.uwe@t-online.de: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Using ON4KST-chat (score: 1)
Author: "Uwe Granzow" <dl3bqa.uwe@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:13:49 -0000
Hi out there, I'm just a bit shocked about the cheating discussion especially by using ON4KST-chat. I can hardly understand the discussion around the 160m-chat, but to discuss it also for the microwa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00492.html (8,061 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Again ON4KST-chat (score: 1)
Author: "Uwe Granzow" <dl3bqa.uwe@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:30:02 -0000
Hi again, ON4KST-chat works via packet as well in Germany, but via Internet it's much faster. I've never used the chat on 160mtrs, but tnx for the advice with the rules for shortwave. And if packet g
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00508.html (9,975 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] Once again ON4KST (score: 1)
Author: "Uwe Granzow" <dl3bqa.uwe@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:40:03 -0000
I used "we" cause of working Multi-OP as DF0TEC or now DM0Y in the VHF/UHF/SHF-tests, sri for the misunderstanding. You could see that I used "I" as I wrote about operating on shortwave or using the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00509.html (11,782 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu