Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dougw9wi@gmail.com: 121 ]

Total 121 documents matching your query.

81. [CQ-Contest] TNQP log deadline approaching (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 13:46:52 -0500
Logs for the Tennessee QSO Party are due by the end of the day next Friday, October 8th. We've received a record number of logs, but would love to have more! Please keep 'em coming.. -- Doug Smith W9
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-10/msg00013.html (6,498 bytes)

82. [CQ-Contest] Tennessee QSO Party log deadline is TONIGHT (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 14:02:22 -0500
We've got 226 logs as of 2:00 CT. You have ten more hours to get yours in; the more the merrier! (logs submitted today aren't on the "logs received" page of our website yet. If you received a confirm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-10/msg00071.html (6,715 bytes)

83. Re: [CQ-Contest] [RTTY] NA Sprint RTTY Log Check Report Analysis (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 07:14:59 -0500
I just finished checking the logs for the Tennessee QSO Party. (results will be out within the next week) We had one entrant whose log indicated he operated from one county, but almost everyone who w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-10/msg00249.html (9,082 bytes)

84. Re: [CQ-Contest] Omitting callsigns in echanges (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:38:02 -0600
For this specific reason, SS is unique. The originating station's callsign is part of the header of a formal radiogram; the message could not be handled properly without it. Much of the origin of th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00165.html (8,583 bytes)

85. Re: [CQ-Contest] Conditions this weekend (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 16:06:11 -0600
Unfortunately, simply talking about poor sunspot numbers may do more to reduce the number of QSOs above 14MHz than the poor sunspot numbers themselves(grin)... Seriously, the numbers may not be what
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00459.html (8,692 bytes)

86. Re: [CQ-Contest] Frustration this weekend..... (score: 1)
Author: doug smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 18:46:50 -0600
I didn't move on -- I called them. After all, it might be a needed mult.. If they then IDd (or IDd in the next QSO), I logged them. If they didn't -- well, it's pretty hard to log a QSO with a statio
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00520.html (9,738 bytes)

87. Re: [CQ-Contest] unscrupulous and frustrating (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 01:43:41 -0600
I think I typed up a similar proposal in a private email to someone else. It would work like this: Modifications would be made in node software to establish optional "obfuscation levels". Bit 1: If s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-12/msg00029.html (9,692 bytes)

88. Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestion for NAQP (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:54:50 -0600
At least literally, there are no states in the other Central American countries. (they call their sub-national subdivisions something else) -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View, TN EM66 ________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00172.html (8,827 bytes)

89. Re: [CQ-Contest] XEs in contest (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 08:20:22 -0600
I would imagine it's difficult for most of us to understand this rule. There simply isn't much chance a team of Germans or Australians or Japanese will build a superstation in Boston, far better than
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-01/msg00231.html (8,539 bytes)

90. Re: [CQ-Contest] About Remote Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 09:52:50 -0600
It should probably be noted... that both the ARRL rules for all HF contests, and the CQ WW rules, as they exist today, explicitly allow for remote stations with the control point located outside the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-02/msg00371.html (7,004 bytes)

91. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is ARRL DX Really Broken ? (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 07:19:06 -0500
How many participants in ARRL DX (or for that matter, any other contest) enter with the belief they may win? Seems to me the vast majority of those who make QSOs in any contest do not believe for one
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00152.html (8,068 bytes)

92. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is ARRL DX Really Broken ? (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:34:06 -0500
I have GOT to stop posting so close to when I leave for work... I don't think I emphasized highly enough the last sentence -- and the point -- of my post. IMHO, leveling -- or not leveling -- the pla
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00159.html (8,509 bytes)

93. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX "Leveling, Handicapping, Equalizing" (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 21:10:33 -0500
Not that I really think the scoring system needs changing, but to toss out an outside-the-box thought... How about a scheme where the winner is the entrant whose score has seen the greatest improveme
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00032.html (8,285 bytes)

94. [CQ-Contest] TN QSO Party logs due TODAY (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 07:39:09 -0500
Today is the deadline for sending in your log for the Tennessee QSO Party. We've received 212 logs so far. We'd love to see that number grow! -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View, TN EM66 _______________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00057.html (6,984 bytes)

95. Re: [CQ-Contest] End of contest and rewriting log (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 08:30:19 -0500
Given the nature of the contest this data may be of limited value, but... The Tennessee QSO Party allows roughly 30 days for submission of entries. That period closed on Thursday. Offered without com
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-10/msg00076.html (8,065 bytes)

96. Re: [CQ-Contest] What would you have done? (score: 1)
Author: doug smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 20:23:27 -0600
To play devil's advocate.. is it possible the correct exchange had been transmitted for both QSOs? i.e... is it possible he was mobile? Years ago, I sent seven different states during an ARRL DX SSB
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00354.html (8,431 bytes)

97. Re: [CQ-Contest] unIDs (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 10:48:00 -0600
I respond to this with "CALL?". (they usually *do* then ID. Whether they get the point -- as to why I just called them for the 3rd/4th/5th time -- I have no idea.) -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View, T
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00449.html (8,509 bytes)

98. Re: [CQ-Contest] Calling Disease/UnID from the DX side (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:53:31 -0600
I'm sure this isn't what Dennis has in mind but... IMHO this could be read as "don't waste my time trying to work me if you're unassisted". Will those who are opposed to the use of "local Skimmers*"
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00543.html (8,486 bytes)

99. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fw: W1CTN DISPATCH ARRL CW Score - AKA when contesting goes bad :) (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:15:37 -0600
E. Bang your head in frustration as the DX operator waits 10 minutes to sign his call, because everyone else is skipping Step B. This problem seemed a LOT worse in ARRL CW than in past contests. -- D
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-02/msg00244.html (8,199 bytes)

100. Re: [CQ-Contest] Keyboard for Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Doug Smith <dougw9wi@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:06:18 -0500
One thing I feel compelled to mention whenever the term "wireless keyboard" comes up... DO NOT use more than one in the same room! We learned the hard way at work. These things automatically handshak
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-03/msg00191.html (7,495 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu