Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:droese@necg.de: 87 ]

Total 87 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2010 ARRL 10 Meter Results Are Online (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:11:19 +0200
Hi Sean, what about the 2009 results article? That is still missing on the web. :-(( Thanks & 73, Olli - DH8BQA _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00058.html (8,386 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Leveling the playing field (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:03:23 +0200
Hi Joe & all, that's why you would define *fixed* time slots for "wanted duping" (please re-read David's suggestion), i.e. 6 hours. Meaning if the contest starts at 12 UTC you can work me once betwee
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00209.html (17,947 bytes)

23. [CQ-Contest] Fw: [RRDXA] E73M - I have cheated (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:32:24 +0200
Interesting to say the least ... 73, Olli - DH8BQA _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-08/msg00132.html (8,322 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fw: [RRDXA] E73M - I have cheated (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:39:26 +0200
Does that work Al? So I should never again call K1TTT, KC1XX, W3LPL, etc. (having the faith they are all running legally) just because they are louder then the rest of the gang? What about antenna, h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-08/msg00190.html (17,150 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Control in Contests (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 14:09:36 +0200
You don't need remote stations for that, just "good friends". This kind of cheating was present already 30 years ago when nobody knew how to spell "internet". ;-)) 73, Olli - DH8BQA I think the suspe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-04/msg00221.html (11,148 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2012 ARRL DX CW Results Are Online (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 00:21:13 +0200
http://www.arrl.org/contest-results-articles works better. ;-) Tnx Sean! 73, Olli - DH8BQA _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lis
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00192.html (9,070 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] EFxHQ - SPAIN HQ Station in IARU HF 2012 (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:24:25 +0200
Jesus, make the award as PDF free for everybody! That will probably give you a few more contacts. Having to pay is surely *no* incentive for all the casual ops ... ;-) 73 & gl, Olli - DH8BQA This yea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-07/msg00075.html (9,777 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX and LOTW (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 21:26:00 +0200
Tim, ever heard of "the bureau"? Will cost nothing (at least internationally for US operators) except membership in your local society (ARRL for US). Just to add still another point of view. ;-) 73,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-07/msg00267.html (10,056 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX and LOTW (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 23:52:37 +0200
Thanks to Charles and John for the clarification. Was not aware that there are additional fees besides ARRL membership. Seems we're living in perfect world concerning this in Germany and I suppose mo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-07/msg00271.html (9,730 bytes)

30. [CQ-Contest] WWDX log checking software glitch ? (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 15:06:06 +0200
Dear contest committee, I just started analysing my last year's WWDX UBN's and found a few strange things already. Please see my detailed analysis for a few sample QSOs below. To my mind those errors
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00143.html (12,759 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] WWDX log checking software glitch ? (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 22:55:10 +0200
Thanks Paul, I was not aware of it. ;-) 73, Olli - DH8BQA Oliver, CQ is aware of this and will post corrected results on their website soon. See here: http://cqnewsroom.blogspot.com/2012/08/software-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-08/msg00155.html (16,290 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Serial port question (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 13:11:44 +0200
How will that help him to share the COM port amongst different applications wanting to access the Yaesu's serial port? @Ken: You might want to google for "serial port splitter", there are a few appli
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-05/msg00367.html (10,103 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 20:04:31 +0200
If you remote across borders, dont you need at a minimum the proper license to do that? Where is the difference to being there in person? New rule proposal: for all remote contest operations, have th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-06/msg00328.html (9,158 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Query on KP1H (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 23:14:01 +0100
Maybe KB1H? ;-) 73, Olli - DH8BQA -- Original Message -- From: "DickT-W0RAA" <dickt@w0raa.com> To: "cq-contesting" <cq-contest@contesting.com>; "Grand Mesa Contest Club" <gmc@grandmesa.org>; "Mile Hi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-10/msg00191.html (9,608 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] Increasing contest participation (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 23:59:11 +0100
Exactly this is done by the DCL - DARC Contest Logbook. DARC automatically puts all confirmed contest QSOs into the DCL database. Besides this they also import the big CQ contest logs (only confirmed
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00115.html (10,896 bytes)

36. [CQ-Contest] Station available for WPX-SSB in or around Boston, MA? (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 16:34:37 +0100
Hi guys, as it turns out I will probably be in Boston, MA, for QRL the week before WPX-SSB. Is there any contest station in reasonable distance I could use to experience WPX from the other side of th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-01/msg00138.html (6,971 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R (score: 1)
Author: "droese@necg.de" <droese@necg.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 14:17:15 +0100 (CET)
Hi Randy, at first I though that might be an error and your "it is now allowed" should have been "it is not allowed". Checking the general rules for all entrants they state: "Only one signal on a ban
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-02/msg00224.html (11,068 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] Using N1MM to operate 2 contests... (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 15:10:39 +0200
Hi Lloyd, you can switch between the contests by re-opening the other log (File -> Open log in database). Not too convenient but better than nothing. I'm not aware of any possibility to run 2 instanc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-04/msg00079.html (9,015 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX plaque (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 20:01:45 +0200
WPX CW 2014? Back to future? ;-) Congrats Frank! 73, Olli - DH8BQA Contest, DX & radio projects: http://www.dh8bqa.de Am 09.04.2014 09:22, schrieb S51F: I am very glad, that i recieved my first plaqu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-04/msg00123.html (7,562 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] error report (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Dröse <droese@necg.de>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 13:01:43 +0200
Hi Bob, 0.3% error rate in reports/exchanges sounds a bit high in a contest where just CQ zones are exchanged. On the contrary in a contest with serial numbers like WPX I would rate 0.3% error rate i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-04/msg00159.html (8,574 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu