Mail Archive Search: <+from:ei4hq@qsl.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:ei4hq@qsl.net: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Re eQSL change of policy... (score: 1): Author: ei4hq@qsl.net (Cormac, EI4HQ); Date: Sat Apr 6 08:22:35 2002; I've been following this thread with some interest. I've some = clarifications if I may. All the questions below relate to statements = made in emails on this thread... Is it the case that US station; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00071.html (6,737 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] eQSL change of policy (score: 1): Author: ei4hq@qsl.net (Cormac, EI4HQ); Date: Tue Apr 9 20:35:24 2002; Firstly thanks to all for answering the questions I posted in relation to this thread on Saturday. I emailed eQSL.cc and requested information on the "new" InBox situation. Specifically I asked them; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00103.html (9,993 bytes)
3. Fw: [CQ-Contest] eQSL QSO Times (score: 1): Author: ei4hq@qsl.net (Cormac, EI4HQ); Date: Wed Apr 10 23:28:54 2002; I've received several [off-line] responses to my email about eQSL time matching for QSO's - some quite entertaining and all in the right spirit I hasten to add! A number of them highlighted problems; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00117.html (7,166 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] A Contesters new Rig Choice: down to a vote - yours... (score: 1): Author: ei4hq@qsl.net (Cormac, EI4HQ); Date: Sat May 11 09:45:11 2002; Please respond directly to me at ei4hq@qsl.net I'll post summary results = on this mailgroup later. DECISION TIME... My new QTH is currently being built - below is the station planned for = it after; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00112.html (7,815 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Re dit dit dit dit (score: 1): Author: ei4hq@qsl.net (Cormac, EI4HQ); Date: Tue May 14 20:05:24 2002; I'd refer you to the manual for Super Duper by EI5DI. SD allows you = modify the keying characteristics to the extent that you can effectively = emphasise certain parts of your call. I'm sure other p; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00166.html (7,423 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] RIG CHOICE: Poll Results... (score: 1): Author: ei4hq@qsl.net (Cormac, EI4HQ); Date: Thu May 16 18:02:57 2002; With thanks to all contributors...EI4HQ --SNIP-- Total poll: 37 Spoiled votes (no clear choice identified): 4 Result: Yaesu FT1000MP Mk V 16 Icom IC756PROII 12 Yaesu FT920 2 Icom IC7400 (746PRO) 3 So; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00185.html (9,863 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] eqsl.cc patents? (score: 1): Author: ei4hq@qsl.net (Cormac, EI4HQ); Date: Tue May 21 21:25:48 2002; Well what your saying makes perfect sense - to another programmer anyhow :o) 'cept for one small thing: the whole question of patents & IPR's (Intellectual Property Rights) doesn't look at the "esse; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00249.html (7,730 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]