- 1. [CQ-Contest] push around/interference (score: 1)
- Author: ericj@kudonet.com (Eric June)
- Date: Wed Mar 1 02:51:10 2000
- successful QSO's, then station 2 "won" the frequency and did NOT steal it from station 1. This IS a contest. By CQ'ing, the frequency is up for grabs. it. Why is this so hard to understand? Wow! Now
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00004.html (7,794 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] Re: weighing worth of OPINIONS (score: 1)
- Author: ericj@kudonet.com (Eric June)
- Date: Fri Mar 3 02:21:50 2000
- Doug, I'll name that name for you, twas I, KU6J. I fail to see why contesting "credentials" are required to make a basic interpretation of FCC rules prohibiting deliberate interference, or interpreti
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00029.html (11,402 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] WPX Rules Question (score: 1)
- Author: ericj@kudonet.com (Eric June)
- Date: Mon Mar 22 00:20:54 1999
- Gang, I have reviewed the WPX rules at http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/n8bjq/98wpxrules.htm and one thing is still not clear to me. Are there seperate Tribander/Single Element call area awar
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00299.html (6,806 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] Multiport I/O Boards? (score: 1)
- Author: ericj@kudonet.com (Eric June)
- Date: Thu May 13 14:15:34 1999
- I am looking for a multiport I/O board for my computer. I found a mention of a Flexport42 board by Quickpath in the archives from 1995 (KA9FOX site). The board is not listed on the Quickpath site at
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00250.html (7,181 bytes)
- 5. [CQ-Contest] Re: WPX Rumination (score: 1)
- Author: ericj@kudonet.com (Eric June)
- Date: Sun May 30 20:14:54 1999
- Pete, How about giving yourself a handicap for the next WPX, just to make things more interesting? I operate with a handicap in all contests (not voluntarily, I don't have a choice at this QTH). I us
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00322.html (8,166 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu