- 1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Efficiently Calling CQ in CW Contests (score: 1)
- Author: "Phillip Landmeier" <felipe@conexion.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:21:14 -0500
- Seems the we "TEST at the end" guys are in the minority Mark, but I strongly agree with you. When I'm in S&P mode and tuning up the band picking off contacts as fast as I can, I invariably drop into
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00494.html (15,101 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] Scoring a log (score: 1)
- Author: "Phillip Landmeier" <felipe@conexion.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 10:19:56 -0500
- Hello all! I'm looking for recommendations on the easiest tool to use for score calculations. For the BARTG RTTY contest, I'm using MMTTY for operation and logging. Unlike CT or NA, it does my dupe c
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00479.html (8,042 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] BARTG Scoring with N1MM (score: 1)
- Author: "Phillip Landmeier" <felipe@conexion.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 11:37:22 -0500
- To All, Thank you very much for your recommendation of N1MM. I've used CT for years and never gave much thought to the N1MM logger. I've downloaded it, installed it, and am studying it. Old habits ar
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00499.html (8,002 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CQ-Contest] ANOTHER SMELLY SUBJECT (score: 1)
- Author: "Phillip Landmeier" <felipe@conexion.com>
- Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 23:29:00 -0500
- As your message came in Zack, I was about to say the same thing. I only run a little peanut-whistle station these days but if a station is fairly strong I can ALWAYS work them on the first call. This
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00080.html (13,340 bytes)
- 5. Re: [CQ-Contest] ANOTHER SMELLY SUBJECT (score: 1)
- Author: "Phillip Landmeier" <felipe@conexion.com>
- Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 16:39:06 -0400
- Hi Bill, You could well be right. This happens on 15 and 10 meters, apparently due to ionospheric "tilting" that causes so-called one-way skip. But this was on 20M where the phenomenon is rarer but n
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00105.html (10,435 bytes)
- 6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Awsome message? (score: 1)
- Author: "Phillip Landmeier" <felipe@conexion.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 12:13:38 -0400
- I agree with Ron. Unless you have been living under a rock, you know that there is plenty of intense opposition to the U.S. colonization of Iraq. And, to those holding that opinion, the original mess
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00455.html (12,784 bytes)
- 7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: awesome double dipping, for dummies (score: 1)
- Author: "Phillip Landmeier" <felipe@conexion.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 13:00:46 -0400
- For 80 and 160m inverted vees, I've had good results from running two different length elements in parallel on each half of the antenna. Even parallel elements of the same length, held apart with spr
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00013.html (9,013 bytes)
- 8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Meaningful Contest Exchange (score: 1)
- Author: "Phillip Landmeier" <felipe@conexion.com>
- Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 10:30:02 -0400
- NOOOOO!!! The whole reason I changed callsigns is that I was tired of torturing others and myself with AB7BS, ?, AB7BS, ?, AB7BS, ?, ... AGN, AGN, AGN, pleeeeze. DE KW2P, Phil _______________________
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00061.html (8,453 bytes)
- 9. [CQ-Contest] Digital modes, PSK31 (score: 1)
- Author: "Phil Landmeier" <felipe@conexion.com>
- Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 10:08:13 -0400
- Does anyone know of a comprehensive and accurate list of digital mode contests (PSK31, MFSK, etc.) on the web? The few I've found are incomplete, erroneous, and not maintained. Does anyone know of a
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-07/msg00030.html (6,893 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu