Mail Archive Search: <+from:frenaye@direcway.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:frenaye@direcway.com: 31 ]

Total 31 documents matching your query.

21. [CQ-Contest] 2003 WPX SSB - NA Final Claimed Scores (score: 1): Author: frenaye@direcway.com (Tom Frenaye); Date: Sun May 11 10:26:39 2003; The CQ-contest reflector archives are the place to find the 3830 claimed scores - you can see them going back several years if you want. The last one for CQ WPX SSB (North America) is here --> http:/; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00112.html (10,067 bytes)
22. [CQ-Contest] WPX T/S interpretation (score: 1): Author: frenaye@direcway.com (Tom Frenaye); Date: Tue May 20 17:48:22 2003; The rules say: http://home.woh.rr.com/wpx/WPXRules2003.pdf It's always best to directly ask the contest sponsors questions like yours...and not the reflector. <k6aw@cqww.com> -- Tom -- e-mail: frenay; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00212.html (7,719 bytes)
23. [VHFcontesting] Re: CONTEST RULES CHANGE - ARRL CONTESTS (score: 1): Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@direcway.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:38:05 -0400; The only real change to off times in ARRL contests is that the 10m contest now requires a minimum of 30 minutes for off times - it didn't used to be specified and some people took advantage of it to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00116.html (9,231 bytes)
24. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: CQ WW RTTY SPOT REPORT (score: 1): Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@direcway.com>; Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2003 12:41:43 -0400; I know some people have received warning letters from ARRL. That usually does it - they don't repeat. I believe the problems did not come from competitive (top in state/section) stations. -- Tom == e; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00059.html (8,121 bytes)
25. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW SS question (score: 1): Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@direcway.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 18:49:32 -0400; ARRL members can see how many QSOs each station made per band last year by looking at the on-line scores database. SS CW --> http://www.arrl.org/members-only/contests/scores.html?con_id=20 SS SSB ->; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-10/msg00134.html (8,928 bytes)
26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Improper packet spotting? (score: 1): Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@direcway.com>; Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 17:28:12 -0500; I didn't check the packet logs for Saturday, but on Sunday I didn't find many USA stations spotting USA stations. Out of 18,000 spots on Sunday, I ignored those on SSB, or on 10-18-24 MHz, or on 6 me; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00058.html (11,006 bytes)
27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes (score: 1): Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@direcway.com>; Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 11:46:11 -0500; Interesting question. Looking back at previous logs here we usually have about 100 dupes in a 3000 QSO log, and 140 dupes in a 4000 QSO log and 175 in a 5000 QSO log. I bet K3LR W3LPL and KC1XX end; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00148.html (10,196 bytes)
28. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1): Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@direcway.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 18:35:00 -0400; Some people wait until the contest log deadline to submit their logs, and to prepare their LOTW file to upload. I suspect in the case of W1AW/5 multi-multi they had the additional task of consolidati; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00302.html (7,989 bytes)
29. Re: [CQ-Contest] logging & issues (score: 1): Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@direcway.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 18:04:13 -0400; Rather than feeling safe about not copying the zone, feel uneasy. All we know is that CQ has apparently not checked the zone in recent years. Things can change. When I checked logs by hand at ARRL 25; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00598.html (9,604 bytes)
30. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB (40M) (score: 1): Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@direcway.com>; Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 21:25:20 -0500; John - The ARRL filed a request with the FCC in March 2002 to move the bottom of the US phone band on 40m to 7125. The FCC released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ET 04-140) in April 2004 (more tha; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00062.html (9,354 bytes)
31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Young Contesters, Unite! (score: 1): Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@direcway.com>; Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:02:37 -0500; The current fund is administered by the ARRL Foundation and is intended for a USA competitor: This would be a good time to contribute to the WRTC fund to insure that $1000 is available to a young USA; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00284.html (10,319 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 31
Page: [1] [2]