Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:g4piq@btinternet.com: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] RE: [UK-CONTEST] FT1000 or FT1000MP? (LONG) (score: 1)
Author: <"Andy Cook"@contesting.com>, "G4PIQ" <g4piq@btinternet.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:33:01 -0000
I've used both the 1000 and the 1000MP (original version). I find the close-in strong signal performance of the MP better and this has been borne out for mein the lower number of burbles in contests
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00478.html (13,374 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Narrow SSB filtering for contesting (score: 1)
Author: g4piq@btinternet.com (g4piq@btinternet.com)
Date: Tue Jan 16 15:19:30 2001
I went through the debate of whether to get the 2.1 kHz set or the 1.8 kHz INRADs for an FT1000MP about a year ago. I took advice from the group and there was about a 50/50 split between the two opti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-01/msg00084.html (8,178 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu