Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:hfdxmonitor@gmail.com: 134 ]

Total 134 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting explanation from CQWW blog (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 15:20:54 -0400
Hi Kelly, Very simple: unassisted means you can't receive spots, not that you can't send them. Ok...I thought it applied both ways. That's a problem right there, I think. Half-duplex assisted or unas
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00286.html (12,628 bytes)

82. [CQ-Contest] Self-spotting explanation from CQWW blog. (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 16:18:18 -0400
Mike, Good comments, as always, whether one agrees in totality with them or not. I know I'm nit-picking, but I could not resist. :^) How would you describe this behavior? Would you describe it the sa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00287.html (7,771 bytes)

83. [CQ-Contest] CM-500 headset. (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 17:46:03 -0500
The CM-500 can be difficult to find sometimes. Some say that the Koss SB-45 is pretty much the same, at half the cost. For those looking for a dynamic mic, instead o electret, the Koss SB-40 is the w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00119.html (6,705 bytes)

84. Re: [CQ-Contest] CM-500 headset. (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 19:35:27 -0500
Hi Wayne, Just to clarify, most modern Icoms need an electret element. The SB-40 is dynamic, so a blocking capacitor is needed. One plus for the Koss is the lifetime warranty. I don't know if it cove
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00126.html (8,158 bytes)

85. [CQ-Contest] CM-500 headset. (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 12:13:27 -0500
mic on one pin and mic input on another with either a wire jumper or small resistor between the two pins. Indeed. With both my IC-718 and IC-7300, looks like not wiring pin 2 should be enough to use
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00141.html (7,858 bytes)

86. Re: [CQ-Contest] CM-500 headset. (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 13:05:50 -0500
After a quick look at the Koss SB49 specs, it appears that the only difference between the SB45 and SB49 is that the SB49 has an in-line volume control. Well worth the extra $5 in my opinion. As a ma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00145.html (8,436 bytes)

87. [CQ-Contest] Online Scoreboards. (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 11:19:25 -0500
Make it available to all, both participants and observers, or nobody. Ideally, competitive stations should use the scoreboard, for transparency, educational, and public relations reasons. If access t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00153.html (6,636 bytes)

88. [CQ-Contest] Pileups and calling freqs. (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 17:49:04 -0500
You guys must be reading my mind. I was thinking about asking, but did not want to start a thread, but now I'll. LOL Long time ham, but very green on certain aspects of contesting. I intuitively call
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00175.html (7,318 bytes)

89. [CQ-Contest] Pileups and calling freqs (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:16:11 -0500
Thanks, W6SX. Good idea. I use N1MM as well, but have not explored all the possibilities. I need to find the syntax for the IC-7300, then I'll edit the F4 macro. This CQWW CW was only the second time
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00193.html (8,918 bytes)

90. [CQ-Contest] Sending 'test' (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:41:27 -0500
This is how I 'see' it as well. One can monitor the frequency long enough to find out, I guess, but this speeds things up. I hope it continues to be used, at least until I'm more experienced. Also, a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00194.html (8,332 bytes)

91. [CQ-Contest] Slick New Toy (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 11:17:01 -0500
I agree! I purchased the VA4 just weeks before the release of the VA5. Kicking myself one more time for the bad timing. LOL The VA4 is great, the VA5 is even better. I'm surprised this VNA does not g
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-11/msg00200.html (9,448 bytes)

92. [CQ-Contest] 2018 CQWW CW Raw Score Available (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 09:23:32 -0500
This is interesting. The 4th place in the QRP 10M category scored 0 (zero) points. I hope he has the recordings to back it up. LOL Congrats to the contest management. They are doing a very good job w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-12/msg00009.html (7,200 bytes)

93. [CQ-Contest] WSJT-X and contesting. (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 19:50:24 -0500
Outside of contests, I'm 100% FT8 these days. I have been using the mode from day 1, making on-air contacts with the developers with a freshly compiled version of WSJT-X when it first went 'live'. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-12/msg00022.html (8,230 bytes)

94. [CQ-Contest] WSJT-X and contesting. (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 10:17:56 -0500
With all due respect, the 'social aspect' of contesting is putting faces to callsigns at conventions, otherwise it's 59 ON or 59 04. This mailing list may be another one, but as with conventions, not
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-12/msg00027.html (8,684 bytes)

95. [CQ-Contest] WSJT-X and contesting. (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 10:25:45 -0500
I agree. Mode mixing in contesting is not a good thing. Run them concurrently if you must, but score them separately. 73 de Vince, VA3VF _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mai
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-12/msg00028.html (7,407 bytes)

96. [CQ-Contest] WSJT-X and contesting. (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 12:31:49 -0500
Simple, yes. Effective, not sure, unless you like hoarding callsigns. 1) It still had to be deliberately setup with the help of macros; 2) It won't QSY in search of other stations, or if the frequenc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-12/msg00031.html (7,739 bytes)

97. Re: [CQ-Contest] WSJT-X and contesting. (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 14:20:45 -0500
I thought the radio in hamradio had to do with RF, not sensory faculty (hearing). Since my hearing is going downhill, my hamradio days are numbered, I guess. 73 de Vince, VA3VF FT8 is not ham radio i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-12/msg00033.html (8,019 bytes)

98. Re: [CQ-Contest] WSJT-X and contesting. (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 17:16:32 -0500
Chris, It's a lot more comfortable to be silent, one is always right that way. Correct! No need to resort to aliens. There are better ways to try and refute a comment. This is actually an indication
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-12/msg00039.html (8,541 bytes)

99. [CQ-Contest] Remote Ops. WAS: Contesters review: new FT8, WSJT 2.0.0. (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 18:05:14 -0500
I want to apologize in advance to those that will feel "betrayed" by the fact that this message is not about a new FT8 robot, so nothing for them to be indignant about. But wait, all is not lost...in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-12/msg00180.html (8,502 bytes)

100. Re: [CQ-Contest] Robotic contest operating, why not? (score: 1)
Author: DXer <hfdxmonitor@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 22:13:04 -0500
Jukka, How many attendees had heart attacks or nervous breakdowns during the presentation? I'm non-sectarian, and could feel my heart missing a couple of beats. LOL 73 de Vince, VA3VF == I just asked
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-12/msg00184.html (7,742 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu