Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:i4ufh@libero.it: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] My RED CARD - IT9GSF (score: 1)
Author: I4UFH <i4ufh@libero.it>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:16:38 +0200
Hi Guys, This is a good starting point. Same question was raised to the CC Director, and the answer is in the rules, the rule is very clear. The RC/YC will apply to all operators. They do this becaus
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00219.html (11,374 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX 10 min rule for MS - survey (score: 1)
Author: I4UFH <i4ufh@libero.it>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:28:57 +0200
In a time slot of 10 min u can use other band to pickup mults, interlocked with the run station , to be compliant with the rules of one signal only on air .. It Is not a multiplier transmitter ?? 73
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-04/msg00232.html (8,432 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] How many pins may dance??? (score: 1)
Author: I4UFH <i4ufh@libero.it>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 15:35:28 +0200
Hi Hank, Definitely I agree with you, this issue has been fixed from several years from software developers that didn't check the HQ call sign to qualify the multiplier but use the sended exchange ,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-07/msg00103.html (15,883 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Scoring System needs revision? (score: 1)
Author: Fabio I4UFH <i4ufh@libero.it>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:38:21 +0100
Hi Guys, Even it will be impossible to equalize the world, with the right equation, i have one more simple idea, that i didnt show up, this year, apologies if if has still be discussed in the past :
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00026.html (12,022 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Scoring System needs revision? (score: 1)
Author: I4UFH <i4ufh@libero.it>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 15:30:01 +0100
Hi Stan, Suggesting these rules include also the DX side of the QSO that indeed for W1 is difficult to work W6 as G station so i expect to add more fun and competition to the black hole Guys without
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00033.html (15,715 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Scoring System needs revision? (score: 1)
Author: Fabio I4UFH <i4ufh@libero.it>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 19:54:28 +0100
Hi Fellows, There will always someone that didnt agree, because everyone look at only to his own personal case, what is needed is that we, everyone, have a view over our nose, and understand that sho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-12/msg00044.html (11,433 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu