Mail Archive Search: <+from:ids@nol.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:ids@nol.net: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Has RF attacked you contest PC? (score: 1): Author: "R.S.Hradilek" <ids@nol.net>; Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 19:17:36 -0600; I operated from a well known and well built contest station for the ARRL CW - my first SOAB effort apart from my tri-banders at home. Prior to the contest, we upgraded his shack 486-33 to an HP Pavil; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00520.html (8,757 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Was "R2" a valid Mult in IARU? (score: 1): Author: ids@nol.net (R.S.Hradilek); Date: Fri Jul 18 16:23:18 2003; That is what VE6HF was sending each time I worked him. He is also in Zone 02. Is "R2" a special mult, or was this just his way of saying he is in IARU Zone 02? Roy -- AD5Q; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00201.html (7,742 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Are You a Contester ? (score: 1): Author: ids@nol.net (R.S.Hradilek); Date: Tue Jul 13 04:21:28 1999; <color><param>0100,0100,0100</param><FontFamily><param>COMIC SANS MS</para= urn into flame wars, but I do have a point to make regarding QRLing. I am mostly in sympathy with Jim, KH2D, but have a dif; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00017.html (11,568 bytes)
4. No subject (score: 1): Author: ids@nol.net (R.S.Hradilek); Date: Wed Jul 14 04:44:28 1999; copy. Now we are getting somewhere. I like this idea. The QRL scenario needs more abbreviation for CW contests. This would have to be adopted by convention among contesters so we would all recognize; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00024.html (9,276 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Are You a Contester ? (score: 1): Author: ids@nol.net (R.S.Hradilek); Date: Tue Jul 13 04:21:28 1999; <color><param>0100,0100,0100</param><FontFamily><param>COMIC SANS MS</para= urn into flame wars, but I do have a point to make regarding QRLing. I am mostly in sympathy with Jim, KH2D, but have a dif; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00142.html (11,553 bytes)
6. No subject (score: 1): Author: ids@nol.net (R.S.Hradilek); Date: Wed Jul 14 04:44:28 1999; copy. Now we are getting somewhere. I like this idea. The QRL scenario needs more abbreviation for CW contests. This would have to be adopted by convention among contesters so we would all recognize; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00149.html (9,305 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] Re-allocate Novice CW to RTTY (score: 1): Author: ids@nol.net (R.S.Hradilek); Date: Sat Jul 25 17:14:32 1998; I am sure many will jump on the bandwagon over this one and bemoan the effect the ARRL proposals will have in hastening the demise of CW. I feel it is the prior lightening of standards that brought u; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00228.html (8,677 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]