Mail Archive Search: <+from:jbattin@email.msn.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:jbattin@email.msn.com: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Oh my gawd TS870 question! (score: 1): Author: jbattin@email.msn.com (John Battin); Date: Wed Mar 1 06:37:25 2000; The new models are improved...but unless you want to make extensive modifications to add more narrow crystal filters to the early IF stages I would go for a reciever with filters in both the high IF; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00005.html (6,619 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] Frequency stealing (score: 1): Author: jbattin@email.msn.com (John Battin); Date: Wed Mar 1 06:40:49 2000; AMEN.. The questions is where can I go, have a good chance of getting a good frequency, and cause the least grief. John K9DX -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrativ; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00006.html (6,765 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] Re: IC756 PRO and other contesting rigs (score: 1): Author: jbattin@email.msn.com (John Battin); Date: Fri Mar 10 11:13:17 2000; The w8ji noise blanker makes a lot of difference when the difference between the interfering signals is narrow..like 50 to 200 hz..With some offsets it can make a 30db difference. I have measured a l; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00128.html (8,543 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Receiver specs (score: 1): Author: jbattin@email.msn.com (John Battin); Date: Fri Mar 10 19:49:41 2000; I recently measured my 746 and it looked very good under single signal interference conditions but marginal under two signal intermodulation conditions. It is way better than the DSP rigs I have look; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00137.html (6,912 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Bogus Packet Spots (score: 1): Author: jbattin@email.msn.com (john battin); Date: Mon Feb 22 18:21:54 1999; It happens all the time...when you are working m/m or single band most of the unique calls identified by packet are blown calls and you have to be careful not to run off half cocked and dupe someone.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-02/msg00022.html (6,989 bytes)
6. [CQ-Contest] Bogus Packet Spots (score: 1): Author: jbattin@email.msn.com (john battin); Date: Mon Feb 22 18:21:54 1999; It happens all the time...when you are working m/m or single band most of the unique calls identified by packet are blown calls and you have to be careful not to run off half cocked and dupe someone.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-02/msg00050.html (6,990 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] FT-1000 Vs FT-1000MP (score: 1): Author: jbattin@email.msn.com (john battin); Date: Mon May 3 13:25:31 1999; I had a 1000 and an mp side by side for over a year and now I have two 1000's because in two radio operation is harder if the radios are not the same. The block diagram of the receivers are the same,; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00020.html (8,486 bytes)
8. [CQ-Contest] Lets not go back to Spark (score: 1): Author: jbattin@email.msn.com (john battin); Date: Mon May 10 18:51:14 1999; I have been reading cq contest for several years and up to now have resisted adding to already worn and beaten subjects....but....let me add my two cents in. Technology is on the march and we either; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00201.html (8,138 bytes)
9. [CQ-Contest] remote sites (score: 1): Author: jbattin@email.msn.com (John Battin); Date: Thu Dec 23 12:54:19 1999; Is there a web site or a good source of information on remote operation of a dx/contest site??? I need info. on which radios are most easily remoted, modems, line requirements, etc...thanks John K9DX; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00233.html (6,289 bytes)
10. [CQ-Contest] CQ-WW-CW Date ?? (score: 1): Author: jbattin@email.msn.com (john battin); Date: Mon Aug 3 22:14:17 1998; I have always found the cqww cw date the only one that was compatable with work...A long Thanksgiving week-end ... eat turkey and then a free day to get ready to contest. John --Original Message-- Fr; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00065.html (9,465 bytes)
11. [CQ-Contest] WAE & QTC's (score: 1): Author: jbattin@email.msn.com (john battin); Date: Wed Aug 12 03:14:00 1998; I have never heard any prefered process, but I usually wait until I have over 7 or so and then try to send them when things are slow and the potential recieving station seems to be able to copy QRQ w; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00186.html (8,385 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]