- 1. [CQ-Contest] Re: ARRL 10M Published Results (score: 1)
- Author: jefft@wciatl.com (Jeff Tucker)
- Date: Mon Jun 15 11:12:19 1998
- Unfortunately, we at W4AN also made it onto the chopping block and our score was left out of the published results. Our score of 1,124,394 would have been the #1 M/O score. I've got the acknowledgmen
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-06/msg00075.html (7,011 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] 10m writeup on ARRL web site (score: 1)
- Author: jefft@wciatl.com (Jeff Tucker)
- Date: Mon Jun 29 11:37:26 1998
- I applaud K5FUV and the ARRL for quickly jumping on this problem with the 10m contest results and I'm glad they're going to be republished. I do have to question, though, putting the flawed writeup o
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-06/msg00218.html (7,188 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] Re: ARRL 10M Published Results (score: 1)
- Author: jefft@wciatl.com (Jeff Tucker)
- Date: Mon Jun 15 11:12:19 1998
- Unfortunately, we at W4AN also made it onto the chopping block and our score was left out of the published results. Our score of 1,124,394 would have been the #1 M/O score. I've got the acknowledgmen
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-06/msg00286.html (7,043 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] 10m writeup on ARRL web site (score: 1)
- Author: jefft@wciatl.com (Jeff Tucker)
- Date: Mon Jun 29 11:37:26 1998
- I applaud K5FUV and the ARRL for quickly jumping on this problem with the 10m contest results and I'm glad they're going to be republished. I do have to question, though, putting the flawed writeup o
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-06/msg00360.html (7,182 bytes)
- 5. [CQ-Contest] S&Pers' Exchanges (score: 1)
- Author: jefft@wciatl.com (Jeff Tucker)
- Date: Thu Jul 16 12:38:53 1998
- VE5CMA states that both stations must give both calls when completing a contest QSO, but I think that's totally wrong. Nowhere do the rules say that the exchange is the other guys call plus your sign
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00141.html (8,001 bytes)
- 6. [CQ-Contest] S&Pers' Exchanges (score: 1)
- Author: jefft@wciatl.com (Jeff Tucker)
- Date: Thu Jul 16 15:25:44 1998
- Hi, Art. I'd be interested in knowing where that is. I haven't been doing that. 47CFR97.115 Third party communications states that you must send the other stations callsign at the end of an exchange
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00145.html (8,473 bytes)
- 7. [CQ-Contest] S&Pers' Exchanges (score: 1)
- Author: jefft@wciatl.com (Jeff Tucker)
- Date: Thu Jul 16 12:38:53 1998
- VE5CMA states that both stations must give both calls when completing a contest QSO, but I think that's totally wrong. Nowhere do the rules say that the exchange is the other guys call plus your sign
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00361.html (8,007 bytes)
- 8. [CQ-Contest] S&Pers' Exchanges (score: 1)
- Author: jefft@wciatl.com (Jeff Tucker)
- Date: Thu Jul 16 15:25:44 1998
- Hi, Art. I'd be interested in knowing where that is. I haven't been doing that. 47CFR97.115 Third party communications states that you must send the other stations callsign at the end of an exchange
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00363.html (8,504 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu