Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jimk8mr@aol.com: 400 ]

Total 400 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [CQ-Contest] TQP vs CQ RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 16:45:36 EDT
ones. They can't all co-exist on the same frequencies. If you move the contests around, you can minimize the frequency collisions. But if everyone refuses to give up THEIR weekend, it's never going t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00065.html (11,509 bytes)

182. Re: [CQ-Contest] say it ain't so! (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:27:59 EDT
CONSENSUS STATEMENT OF THE SOLAR CYCLE 24 PREDICTION PANEL March 20, 2007 The Solar Cycle 24 Prediction Panel anticipates the solar minimum marking the onset of Cycle 24 will occur in March, 2008 (&p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00212.html (8,795 bytes)

183. Re: [CQ-Contest] Paddle Opinions? (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:04:01 EDT
If you are planning to use the paddles for just the occasional fill while using the keyboard for the normal contest sending/logging, I suggest you look into the K9LU Bulldog paddle. For several years
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00223.html (8,229 bytes)

184. Re: [CQ-Contest] (Bad) Contest Haiku (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:35:56 EDT
No sunspots today Solar flux is sixty eight Ten meters is dead. Hams travel the world Hope to talk to many more They will soon succeed. Leaves are falling down Should I rake them up today Or contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00368.html (7,449 bytes)

185. Re: [CQ-Contest] Cut number advice (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 11:21:44 EST
I used NN VT instead of 99 VT. I got asked for a lot of fills. I found this strange... N for 9 is VERY common. If I sent NN as the fill, they get it immediately. Unlike the NN in 5NN, the SS check ac
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00171.html (9,310 bytes)

186. Re: [CQ-Contest] Assistance & Entry Status (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 12:22:39 EST
Many contests have Single Op ASSISTED. If they do not have that class then you will fall into the Multi category. -- And other contests allow spotting use by single operators without placing them int
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00178.html (8,958 bytes)

187. Re: [CQ-Contest] FREE BEER - Heathrow 20 Nov. (update) (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 22:16:19 EST
And those not going through LHR are probably traveling through MIA. W0NB and I (with my XYL) are passing through MIA on Monday afternoon (11/19) on the way to PJ2T. We're already set up to meet a gro
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00388.html (7,149 bytes)

188. Re: [CQ-Contest] Battle of the Cheaters (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 09:41:32 EST
At the start of this thread I too wondered who was the object of the discussion. I just now went to the 3830 archives and figured it out. Then I pulled out the CQ magazine and noted the DQ notice at
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00120.html (12,504 bytes)

189. Re: [CQ-Contest] renewing the 10 meter contest (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 20:13:37 EST
With the many puny weak signals this weekend, I would have felt very comfortable exchanging grid squares, just like in a VHF contest. As is often the case on 6 meters, a 1000 mile qso is often no big
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00155.html (8,674 bytes)

190. Re: [CQ-Contest] cheating with packet - RD3A case (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:49:38 EST
I agree that this was an excellent piece of work by ES5TV. RD3AF may be, as Tonno says, a well known packet cheater in Europe, but that reputation had not previously made it to the USA. This is a goo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00219.html (8,494 bytes)

191. Re: [CQ-Contest] Simple solution to address CQ WW CW problems (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:52:51 EST
This qualifies as the runner-up entry for "LVIPCQCRTY" Award. (Least Viable Idea Posted on CQ-Contest Reflector This Year") The winner of the "LVIPCQCRTY" Award is "Let's make everyones log public".
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00312.html (9,088 bytes)

192. Re: [CQ-Contest] Recording your CQ WW CW contest (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:38:06 EST
Recording should be right up there with logging. If you didn't log it, you didn't work it. If you didn't record it, you didn't work it. Very simple. -- We don't need to make recordings a condition of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00369.html (7,653 bytes)

193. Re: [CQ-Contest] Recording your CQ WW CW contest (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 23:08:36 EST
There's simply no reason not to require serious contenders for the top ten boxes to record their efforts. ** And having done so, we will then get excited about whether they will use those recordings
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00416.html (9,264 bytes)

194. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Category (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:56:56 EST
The point is IT'S THE ANTENNAS and LOCATION that make the difference in many cases. Not SO2R. Indeed. Maybe we need a new category for SO2T (single op - two towers). Or for SO2R1T. And SO1R2T. And SO
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00521.html (7,451 bytes)

195. Re: [CQ-Contest] Game theory of spotting? (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 12:49:49 EST
A couple more: 1. Spotting everything has been pushed by some of the biggest multi-multis as a good thing to do. It amounts to welfare for the rich, by letting these M/M's pick off the occasional new
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00627.html (12,818 bytes)

196. Re: [CQ-Contest] Getscores.org Changes/Improvements... (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:45:00 EST
In my other competitive hobby/sport - bridge - (which shares a lot of similarities with the sport of radio, probably more so than any athletic sport) - competitors do not know how their opposition is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00336.html (10,031 bytes)

197. Re: [CQ-Contest] Early Contests?... (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 00:06:50 EST
Can anyone help with some research? When was the first amateur radio contest? Does anyone have any details of early contests? Reply direct. I was once told that the first contest happened when the th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00411.html (8,087 bytes)

198. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 16:45:03 EST
What information is a Skimmer going to put into a band map? Any callsign it hears? A callsign with "TEST" appended? A callsign involved with an apparently completed QSO? I can imagine vigilantes/prot
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00127.html (7,930 bytes)

199. Re: [CQ-Contest] Good contact, back to you (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:48:59 EST
Does nobody here understand the concept of adjusting your operating style to suit your audience? If I'm at PJ2T in the midst of a big opening to the states (or EU) during CQWW where I'm one of the fe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00583.html (9,457 bytes)

200. [CQ-Contest] Favorite Ploys (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:33:24 EST
Time for a new thread name. I still like the old standby of an RST other than 59/5NN. 579 is too easy. To really make it tough use 4NN. Many years ago, when the San Francisco 49ers were a good team t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00591.html (8,322 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu