Mail Archive Search: <+from:jirka@jimaz.cz>

Results:

References: [ +from:jirka@jimaz.cz: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] visit in LA dusring ARRL CW - OK1RI (score: 1): Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (Jiri Sanda); Date: Wed Jan 6 20:58:52 1999; I happen to be north of LA next Sunday. I would be most interested to join some MS - MM operation in the area to hear how the bands look from there. I do hope my call is known well enough to know who; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-01/msg00025.html (6,746 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] visit in LA dusring ARRL CW - OK1RI (score: 1): Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (Jiri Sanda); Date: Wed Jan 6 20:58:52 1999; I happen to be north of LA next Sunday. I would be most interested to join some MS - MM operation in the area to hear how the bands look from there. I do hope my call is known well enough to know who; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-01/msg00051.html (6,783 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] WPX - proposed changes (score: 1): Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (jirka@jimaz.cz); Date: Thu Apr 3 23:51:30 1997; I as over 20 years active participant want to come with my vote: 1. Concerning the own country points my personal preference is to keep it as is but I do understand the point of small pistols west of; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00040.html (8,327 bytes)
4. [CQ-Contest] Re: [TowerTalk] Re: # of elevated radials (score: 1): Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (jirka@jimaz.cz); Date: Thu Apr 24 00:36:00 1997; Hi Jan, I bet you do know this signal well enough - not under this callsign but under a bunch of others like : K1AR........... but I do agree with you it is on of big gun W1's on 80m - there is no si; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00262.html (8,647 bytes)
5. [CQ-Contest] Re: [TowerTalk] Re: # of elevated radials (score: 1): Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (jirka@jimaz.cz); Date: Thu Apr 24 22:49:58 1997; No I do say they are about the same, no significant difference, more depends on the propagation, in a moment K1AR might be #1, 15 minutes later W3LPL and another 10 minutes later someone else. 73 ! J; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-04/msg00269.html (7,271 bytes)
6. 160m CONTEST + ICOM radio (score: 1): Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (jirka@jimaz.cz); Date: Thu Feb 29 02:29:25 1996; Towards 160 m rules: 1 Each 160M contest to last from "local dawn to dusk" not from 'x' hours Zulu Consider you are not the only contesters in the USA, think about it. 2 Points based upon radial meas; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00831.html (8,398 bytes)
7. Power (score: 1): Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (jirka@jimaz.cz); Date: Fri Mar 29 00:01:53 1996; Hello everyone, The power discussion has some points. At first my licence limit is 2 kW output so with anything I run or have run fit well within this limit. I do agree with the view of NI6T that the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-03/msg00157.html (9,008 bytes)
8. mail TO N4ZC (score: 1): Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (jirka@jimaz.cz); Date: Thu Apr 4 01:29:40 1996; Sorry to bother all, I was trying to send this directly to Roger N4ZC but it always came back as undelivarable - see below - so sending this way: -- The following addresses have delivery notification; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-04/msg00027.html (18,651 bytes)
9. OK1RI - CQ WW SSB on 20m SO/SB (score: 1): Author: jirka@jimaz.cz (jirka@jimaz.cz); Date: Thu Oct 31 10:24:16 1996; OK1RI CQ WW SSB 20m SO/SB Hello everyone, I also wanted to come with some remarks on the contest. Compared to last year our (understand mine and OK1RFs) antennas on 20m were improved a little bit. We; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-10/msg00214.html (14,326 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]