At 12:05 PM 5/20/2003 -0400, Ron K8NZ <Nzharps@aol.com> asked: I believe so. Ask N8BJQ directly if you want to be sure. The spirit of the rule: - no monobanders - no stacked tribanders - no beam or m
I'm not sure if Charles has done it, but I believe Jeff K1ZM won the assisted category once, beating all the unassisted single ops. I got quite a ration myself for posting mobile stations in the MARA
We *know* what Dan can do from W1! He has operated with us at KC1XX on 40 meters in CQWW CW and REALLY held his own on the band! 73 - Jim AD1C == Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsfor
The attached article is interesting (though 6 months old). While it's OK to "stay in the chair", please get up and stretch every now and then. 73 - Jim AD1C http://straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/health/st
Here's another related article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/2698119.stm There are a number of readers' personal comments/experiences at the bottom. 73 - Jim AD1C -- Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemo
The DX station is unlikely to change his call during the contest. What's more likely is that someone using primitive a logging program MUST log the portable prefix one way or the other (maybe differe
I saw this announcement on the web and thought others might be interested. Maybe Juice can tell us how many days away it is! :-) 73 - Jim AD1C http://www.qsl.net/arrl-sc/sc_qso_party_page.htm SC QSO
Ken hit the nail on the head! As long as log checking is applied FAIRLY and CONSISTENTLY across all logs, there is really no need for post-processing, as it should not change the order of the results
So Glenn, could one say that Rohn's financial difficulties are partly your fault then? Why don't you have a pair of 300' 55G towers outside, rather than a single measly 70' 45G tower? 73 - Jim AD1C -
Thanks for posting this, Bill. What I find most interesting is all the brou-ha-ha on this reflector about packet cheating, allowing packet in all categories etc., when in reality they only caught 12
Try a Google.COM search for "Birthday Problem" Now back to your regularly-scheduled log checking debate, already in progress. 73 - Jim AD1C == Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford,
KC1XX perspective: About three years ago, I did a mass mailing for KC1XX - we sent out about 33K QSL cards to DX stations via the bureau confirming about 66K unique band/mode QSOs. You can read more
AD1C perspective: If I receive a stateside QSL, whether there is return postage or not, it will be answered within a week. Fortunately, Middlesex Co. MA isn't that rare, and I don't have any children
OK, I've probably used up my allowance on this thread, but wanted to add one more thing. Once in a while, unsolicited E-mail will remind you about something. I just received an unsolicited ad from Vi
Hi Jeff, IMO.... While it may be childish, you can't control the other station's behavior, only your own. For at least a couple of years, 9Y4VU would not work KC1XX in a DX contest. We knew he was he
Brian no longer uses that E-mail address. The only way to contact him is via his US Mail address: BRIAN W BEEZLEY 3532 LINDA VISTA DR SAN MARCOS CA 92069 USA 73 - Jim AD1C == Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Cha
Busted Zone. FP8 is in Zone 5, not Zone 16. 73 - Jim AD1C -- Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863 USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.com PGP Fing
Even easier, write "CONFIRMED by" on the back, sign your name and callsign, date it and return the card. ZL3GQ used to do this. Syl, VE5ZX did this for me recently to confirm an unusual Canadian pref
Hi Ken, When we sent out KC1XX cards a few years ago, they were printed directly to card stock, no signature or any other form of "authenticity". No complaints so far. I will, however, add the "No re
Hi Ted, liked the title of your message. Though it's been mentioned here several times of late, I'll toot my own horn again: http://www.ad1c.com/HamRadio/kc1xx_qsl.htm We used BV to do the mass print