At 11:23 AM 9/10/2003, yt3t wrote: Instead of removing uniques, who make it very difficult to be in anyone's log, I suggest that a committee remove those who make it easy in everyone's log, like KC1X
At 04:32 PM 9/11/2003, Ron Notarius WN3VAW wrote: 46th Annual Pennsylvania QSO Party October 11 & 12! www.nittany-arc.org/paqso.html Ron, these are the 2002 rules. Where can we find the 2003 rules? 7
state, as OH" ? Yes - W2SC did that. However, the log checking program isn't smart enough to do that. I know it seems simple enough, but this is an automated process that is done on 2000 logs. The pr
It wouldn't be in violation of ANY rules if he was operting from Finland! He's probably just confused, having stayed up all night in a 160 contest, sending 599 OH. 73 - Jim AD1C == Jim Reisert AD1C,
At 06:16 AM 9/16/2003, Tonno Vahk wrote: If a station does not submit log but still makes a lot of QSOs in contest does it constitute participation or not? If not then he is obviously allowed to self
At 10:26 PM 9/17/2003, Ward Silver wrote: Are there more important things? You bet there are. Catching cheaters, reducing reporting turnaround time, making it easier for people to submit logs, extend
At 01:54 PM 9/17/2003, John Laney wrote: The present system appears to penalize those who abide by the rules by logging what was sent to them. I assume it does not penalize the rules violator, such a
At 05:45 PM 9/17/2003, Zack Widup W9SZ wrote: KH2D has lived in Florida for a couple years now. He just signs "KH2D". I think he probably gets a few people upset with him when they find out he's not
At 10:11 AM 9/18/2003, Chuck K3FT wrote: Is there a possible way/place/means of posting a centralized list of these callsigns which would need to be noted such as kh2d being in w4 land? Or the k2g is
At 12:32 PM 9/18/2003, Tree wrote: The FIRST requirement of a log checking process from my perspective is that it get the final order of finish "right". I do spend some time looking over close finish
At 09:37 AM 9/26/2003, Dennis Ponsness WB0WAO wrote: Now that LoTW is up and running, I have a question for the "big guns" as well as the rest of us <grin>... Will you be uploading your contest logs
At 06:16 AM 9/29/2003, Ed Parish K1EP wrote: Doesn't it make sense that the ARRL should enter contest logs into LoTW? After all, they can verify QSOs by cross checking the logs of many of the partici
In case anyone else received this, the information is wrong. http://www.darc.de/referate/dx/fedcw.htm Dates: CW: August 9/10, 2003 (now history, see activity report) SSB: September 13/14, 2003 (now h
Some people are into "instant gratification". Using LoTW, their needs can be met. I respond to direct QSLs within a week (I don't get many :-) but bureau cards can take years, depending on when I dec
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ARRL-LOTW/ 73 - Jim AD1C == Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863 USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.com PGP Fingerp
-- W0uo@cs.com asked: What about the WT4I Cabrillo tools? www.cabrillotools.com 73 - Jim AD1C == Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863 USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert@alum.mi
Thanks for the reminder, Felix. I hope to post updated files sometime this weekend. Watch the reflectors! 73 - Jim AD1C -- Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863 USA +978-25
Source: http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2003/10/10/6/?nc=1 NEWINGTON, CT, Oct 10, 2003--After completing 43 years of publication, 73 Amateur Radio Today magazine is calling it quits. Plans to publis
At 11:19 PM 10/11/2003, mike l dormann wrote: out of curiosity, how many SS CW stations would i expect to work on 160? I guess the question you have to ask is: Since you can only work a station once,
New country files have been uploaded to http://www.k1ea.com/cty/ Please read RELEASE.TXT for installation instructions. Here are the change notes: 16 October 2003 (CTY-1303) * Changed country name fo