Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:john@kk9a.com: 451 ]

Total 451 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW survey results (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 07:38:40 -0500
A 48 hour classic might also be nice for those that cannot operate SO2R. John KK9A There is a 24 hour category. Single-op, classic. Lots of fun ! 73, Steve, N2IC _____________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2015-12/msg00631.html (7,705 bytes)

142. [CQ-Contest] Re mic headphone switch source?? (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 13:21:11 -0500
Top Ten DX Doubler and MicroHAM Micro 2R are both nice mic/headphone switches. John KK9A Hello, I am looking for a mic/headphone switch<snip> _______________________________________________ CQ-Contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00010.html (7,110 bytes)

143. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW survey results (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2016 13:21:17 -0500
There is no "Classic" in the 30-36 hour WPX contests. Why are you saying that the Low Power category is silly? It happens to be the most popular category and it can be very competitive. John KK9A Thi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00011.html (7,320 bytes)

144. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re mic headphone switch source?? (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 12:04:07 -0500
http://www.dunestar.com/store/Headphone-Switch-cid-5-1.html John KK9A _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mai
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00168.html (8,931 bytes)

145. Re: [CQ-Contest] Inverter generators (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 16:19:18 -0500
I bought a Honda EU2000I for my station in Aruba, after a contest power failure. Having a generator seemed to be good insurance for stabile power because I did not have another failure for a decade.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-01/msg00188.html (9,447 bytes)

146. Re: [CQ-Contest] The new era of Hamradio contests; win a cash prize (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 08:17:36 -0500
Well stated Kelly. Remote Ham Radio and station rentals are also apparently legal. One question is who would sponsor the prize money? Many big contests do not even have plaque sponsors for some popul
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00012.html (10,072 bytes)

147. Re: [CQ-Contest] Seeking New CQ WW Director (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 07:14:05 -0500
K5ZD did a fantastic job as CQ WPX and CQ WW director. We appreciate your efforts and responsiveness in making those contests great. The next director will have some big shoes to fill. GL Randy! John
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00045.html (8,103 bytes)

148. Re: [CQ-Contest] Another grip..... Slow down! (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 21:31:00 -0500
If it was detrimental to their score, they would not be doing it. As long as they ID frequently and do not respond at 35-40 WPM to someone calling CQ at 30 WPM, I do not see anything to gripe about.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00125.html (8,043 bytes)

149. Re: [CQ-Contest] too much complaining about "poor ops" + how to "get even" (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:55:25 -0500
The best frequency for IDing varies with the circumstances. It is a method of pileup control and also saves a little sending time if done properly. CQWW rules require sending your callsign every thre
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00174.html (9,253 bytes)

150. Re: [CQ-Contest] Open Letter to VE Contesters (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 23:17:39 -0500
Why would you not take advantage of a quieter frequency to run Europe and also avoid having zero point US stations (in the ARRL DX Contest) call you? I have spent many many hours outside the US ham p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-02/msg00211.html (8,974 bytes)

151. Re: [CQ-Contest] Little Pistols running (was something else) (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 14:16:37 -0500
How about prohibiting CQing? John KK9A - WP2AA It would be interesting if a major ssb dx contest dared to restrict the percentage/duration of time you could run on 40/20/15M. 73, Barry N1EU _________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00109.html (8,277 bytes)

152. Re: [CQ-Contest] Dupes in FAQ's (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 12:46:45 -0400
Great Idea! I lost a 6 point QSO and a mult last weekend because the stations thought that I was a dupe and went back to CQing. I worked (and logged) all the dupes that called me. John KK9A Everyone
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00277.html (7,698 bytes)

153. Re: [CQ-Contest] Leading Zeros etc.- I hate'm ! (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 09:20:22 -0400
I spent a lot of time on 40m last weekend trying to copy callsigns and serial numbers through QRN, QRM and not great conditions. Leading zeros can be confusing, so can just hearing a single digit num
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-03/msg00287.html (8,827 bytes)

154. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:51:01 -0400
This seems like a perfect solution John KK9A <snip> Perhaps the sponsors could voluntarily disable the band breakdown display during contest weekends, and the whole issue would go away. 73, Pete N4ZR
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00061.html (7,918 bytes)

155. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 08:01:54 -0400
I see that as a major distraction rather than assistance. It would be easier to tune around looking for mults. John KK9A Which is why it is best left in the assisted category. Honestly, even the Mult
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00070.html (9,578 bytes)

156. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 09:54:58 -0400
I hope that this does not happen. The CQ WPX RTTY contest also has no unassisted category. This pushes operators to use the cluster to be competitive instead of using their SO2R S&P skills. John KK9A
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00082.html (8,593 bytes)

157. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:14:13 -0400
So how would you verify that the overlay guys did not use assistance without putting in the same log checking efforts? More importantly, what would happen to the cq-contest list if there was no unass
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00117.html (9,447 bytes)

158. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 11:19:31 -0400
I used to also believe this but it is incorrect. Look how many 2nd radio QSOs N6MJ made in CQWW CW. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=no8nGGa99cE John KK9A SO2R has a very small effect on the number of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00123.html (8,822 bytes)

159. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 13:21:13 -0400
I just ran my 2016 WPX RTTY log though an analyzer and it estimated that 32.3% of my QSOs were made on the second radio. John KK9A _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing l
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00126.html (10,751 bytes)

160. Re: [CQ-Contest] ASSISTED vs UNASSISTED (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 22:00:15 -0400
According to CQWW's survey 54.5% of serious contesters worldwide did not want the categories combined. North American's felt even stronger about this with 71.5% wanting to keep assisted separate. Joh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2016-04/msg00156.html (7,174 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu