Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:john@kk9a.com: 451 ]

Total 451 documents matching your query.

321. Re: [CQ-Contest] Question about category (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 09:36:41 -0500
There may be some advantage to being a guest op. The top three SOAB scores in the last CQWW CW contest were made by guest ops and the top US score was also a guest op. John KK9A How about the guest o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00045.html (8,409 bytes)

322. Re: [CQ-Contest] Question about category (score: 1)
Author: "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 11:32:05 -0400
W2GD and N2NT own stations in the caribbean so they are not guest ops. I had a home and station in the caribbean, being an absentee owner has its own set of challenges. John KK9A - P40A Sent via the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00050.html (10,986 bytes)

323. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Contest Multioperator Station Guidelines (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 09:07:01 -0500
Lets not eliminate multiop categories because of a virus. What is next, eliminate expeditions since flying increases the chance of exposure? Every situation is different. John KK9A Jeff Sent from my
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-10/msg00118.html (8,711 bytes)

324. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:48:26 -0600
I am sorry to see the unassisted category eliminated from the WPX contests. It was so much fun! I imagine that CQWW will eventually do the same. John KK9A QSO alerting systems will now be permitted i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00097.html (8,320 bytes)

325. Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021 (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:01:16 -0500
Unassisted scores typically beat assisted scores in all of the major contests only because that is where the big dogs play. This is true even in contests where multipliers weigh heavily on the score.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00132.html (9,582 bytes)

326. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX Single Op Rules (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 12:50:20 -0600
Single ops in the old assisted category were never required to use assistance. The rules stated "Entrants in this category may use QSO finding assistance". I think it would be foolish not to use spot
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00158.html (7,738 bytes)

327. Re: [CQ-Contest] Should SO and SOA be combined? Randy's survey 2015 (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 13:23:44 -0600
55% of those that participated in this survey did not want the two categories combined. I do know why the term combine is being used. Assisted never required that the operator use the spotting networ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00231.html (10,163 bytes)

328. Re: [CQ-Contest] Are you kidding me (AC0C comments) (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 08:50:20 -0600
There are non-assisted categories in CQWW RTTY so using a RTTY decoder should be excluded from the QSO alerting definition. The WPX RTTY rules are still different from the new "aligned with RTTY" Pho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-11/msg00250.html (8,112 bytes)

329. [CQ-Contest] 11,800 QSOs - Unassisted (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2020 13:45:00 -0600
Congratulations to KL9A for an absolutely incredible CQWW CW score! http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/3830/2020-November/701779.html 73, John KK9A _______________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-12/msg00004.html (6,984 bytes)

330. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW is an unfair Contest -- A solutiion! (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 06:03:30 -0600
CQ already has a world wide contest with serial numbers in the exchange. John KK9A They still need to do something about the CQWW exchange. With zones, it's just a callsign-copying contest. I'm for s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-12/msg00049.html (7,756 bytes)

331. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW is a Great Contest -- NOT(?) (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 08:11:57 -0600
Excellent point Ed and I am glad that all contest are not the same. Every year someone wants to change the CQWW rules to match some other contest. We should all know by now that ham radio contesting
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-12/msg00051.html (7,207 bytes)

332. Re: [CQ-Contest] 15m Yagi question (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 09:07:19 -0600
Hy-Gain typically uses Ø7/16 element tips with a very thin wall, not 7/8. I have owned a couple of Hy-Gain 20m beams that I used for temporary contest antennas and never had much luck keeping the ele
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-12/msg00107.html (8,257 bytes)

333. Re: [CQ-Contest] 15m Yagi question (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 19:25:46 -0500
At least one of the big US M/M stations uses copper grease. After seeing the tremendous antenna corrosion in Aruba between stainless steel and aluminum I have become more cautious about using dissimi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-12/msg00109.html (7,904 bytes)

334. Re: [CQ-Contest] CT .bin file? (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 11:20:03 -0600
Good info on the AD1C utility, perhaps someday I will find and convert my old CT logs. USB floppy drives are $20 and they work well however in my experience floppy disks are not a reliable storage me
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-12/msg00147.html (7,580 bytes)

335. Re: [CQ-Contest] UR input, pse: Coax suppliers (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2020 21:47:19 -0500
I have no personal experience with Shireen coax however there are many posts about their products in the towertalk archives. http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/towertalk/ . John KK9A Douglas
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-12/msg00187.html (7,320 bytes)

336. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting tip of the week (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 17:04:08 -0500
That may be the most time consuming way to make a contest QSO and who knows how accurate that detail of QRZ.com is. For me the joy of ham radio is making contacts, more contacts is more fun. John KK9
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00044.html (8,907 bytes)

337. Re: [CQ-Contest] PSE COPY (score: 1)
Author: john@kk9a.com
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 09:30:45 -0600
I worked the "Please Copy" guy too, it made me smile. Regarding stations sending my callsign multiple times I really had to decided if I wanted a serial number repeated as I was likely get the whole
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00072.html (9,193 bytes)

338. Re: [CQ-Contest] PSE COPY (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 19:09:39 -0500
Hans was very clear as to the contest and mode in the initial PSE COPY post. http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00056.html John KK9A Would people posting here puleeeeeze
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00082.html (8,258 bytes)

339. Re: [CQ-Contest] PSE COPY (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 19:18:05 -0500
I wonder how the RTTY operating practice of sending the report when calling a station started? I have only heard U.S. stations doing this and it was confusing the first time I heard it. You're correc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00083.html (8,118 bytes)

340. Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY contesting; filters (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 20:28:27 -0500
I am sure that is true on a quiet band. I wish that I could find a 600hz opening anywhere on 20m in last weekend's contest. Any QRM in my passband makes decoding very difficult. John KK9A An IF bandw
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-02/msg00098.html (7,602 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu