Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jono@enteract.com: 84 ]

Total 84 documents matching your query.

61. [CQ-Contest] REPORTS in non Numeric formats for ARRL contests (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Tue Aug 17 21:47:39 1999
KW is a common abbreviation that is well known. So are things like QSL, QTH, AGN, etc. These are all standard abbreviations. Cut numbers are not standard, IMHO. 73, Jon KE9NA -- CQ-Contest on WWW: ht
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00134.html (7,319 bytes)

62. [CQ-Contest] Cut Numbers in Log Checking (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Tue Aug 17 21:37:38 1999
With the exception of 5NN, I seriously doubt that most hams out there don't even know what those letters mean. This is particularly true of those guys (like me) who enter a CW contest with the intent
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00138.html (11,153 bytes)

63. [CQ-Contest] Cut Numbers in Log Checking (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Wed Aug 18 17:37:55 1999
The best way to deal with people who send cut numbers: Make the QSO, say QSL, TU and then don't log the QSO, especially if you are like me and don't understand what they sent (I would have NO idea of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00143.html (8,938 bytes)

64. [CQ-Contest] Let's NOT Have a Grid Square Contest (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Mon Aug 23 14:53:12 1999
Rex, Since you modified my original subject line, I feel the need to address this. I don't think the ARRL contest should be changed to a grid square contest. What other changes are needed, I don't ca
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00183.html (7,704 bytes)

65. [CQ-Contest] Dr. Bafoonik (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Sun Aug 1 21:30:34 1999
OK, I've been straightened out! Gee, this one was worse than not knowing about the "last two!" :-) Thanks to all who have straightened me out on the Dr. And to the Doctor himself: I did get a good la
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00268.html (6,818 bytes)

66. R: [CQ-Contest] Highest ever rate ? (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Mon Aug 2 20:39:28 1999
While I agree that one should get points for QSOing "further" away from home, someone somewhere is always going to get shafted. The guys in the Netherland's Antilles are hard to beat cause they get 3
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00277.html (8,342 bytes)

67. [CQ-Contest] Last 2 Revisited and Another Question (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Tue Aug 3 08:13:25 1999
But let's face it, you and I and everyone knows that virtually NO ONE gives "rea" signal reports during contests or even DX-Peditions (happens a little more here). If you can copy them it's "59." The
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00280.html (9,488 bytes)

68. [CQ-Contest] 10M and RTTY Roundup Logs out (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Thu Aug 5 12:40:07 1999
Hi guys, The 1998 ARRL 10M and 1999 RTTY Roundup scores are available on the ARRL members only webpage. Congrats to Dan, N1ND, for doing a great job. According to the article, the 10M contest was the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00322.html (7,013 bytes)

69. [CQ-Contest] NIL and Dupes (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Mon Aug 9 16:15:05 1999
Dick, This brings up a good question I have always had and don't know the answer to: What contact is the official one? The first QSO or the dupe? I generally don't even bother to log the dupe QSOs. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00336.html (6,931 bytes)

70. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 Meter Not-In-Log (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Mon Aug 9 16:18:56 1999
Technically, speaking, Trey I think you are correct. It is incumbent upon BOTH stations to make sure that ALL info is correctly logged. However, in such a case as I get your call right, but you don't
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00337.html (9,334 bytes)

71. [CQ-Contest] Not-In-Log/Penalty (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Wed Aug 11 16:24:41 1999
The "penalty" is that you don't get any points for an invalid contact. 73, Jon KE9NA -- The Second Amendment is NOT about duck hunting! Jon Ogden jono@enteract.com www.qsl.net/ke9na "A life lived in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00354.html (6,805 bytes)

72. [CQ-Contest] 3 QSO Penalty (long) (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Wed Aug 11 16:48:58 1999
Which is why I am REALLY beginning to like the bonus point scoring system that someone on here proposed. Each QSO is worth one point. However, if the logging software verifies the QSO in both station
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00355.html (7,294 bytes)

73. [CQ-Contest] REPORTS in non Numeric formats for ARRL contests (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Tue Aug 17 21:47:39 1999
KW is a common abbreviation that is well known. So are things like QSL, QTH, AGN, etc. These are all standard abbreviations. Cut numbers are not standard, IMHO. 73, Jon KE9NA -- CQ-Contest on WWW: ht
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00395.html (7,339 bytes)

74. [CQ-Contest] Cut Numbers in Log Checking (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Tue Aug 17 21:37:38 1999
With the exception of 5NN, I seriously doubt that most hams out there don't even know what those letters mean. This is particularly true of those guys (like me) who enter a CW contest with the intent
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00399.html (11,071 bytes)

75. [CQ-Contest] Cut Numbers in Log Checking (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Wed Aug 18 17:37:55 1999
The best way to deal with people who send cut numbers: Make the QSO, say QSL, TU and then don't log the QSO, especially if you are like me and don't understand what they sent (I would have NO idea of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00404.html (8,838 bytes)

76. [CQ-Contest] Let's NOT Have a Grid Square Contest (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Mon Aug 23 14:53:12 1999
Rex, Since you modified my original subject line, I feel the need to address this. I don't think the ARRL contest should be changed to a grid square contest. What other changes are needed, I don't ca
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00444.html (7,688 bytes)

77. [CQ-Contest] October QST Comments (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Wed Sep 15 09:59:19 1999
Well, after looking at my October QST, at least I can say the advertisers see contesters as valuable! Did anyone notice the Icom ad just inside the cover that has the "contest season checklist"? I th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-09/msg00052.html (7,147 bytes)

78. [CQ-Contest] Contests (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Wed Sep 15 14:45:55 1999
I disagree with the "lack of new blood" statement given above. The level of people entering major contests is rising. Last year's ARRL 10M contest had the highest participation of ANY ARRL contest EV
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-09/msg00061.html (7,411 bytes)

79. [CQ-Contest] October QST Comments (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Wed Sep 15 14:41:53 1999
One other comment I forgot to make about the issue was the excellent article in the DX section by Bernie, W3UR on the subject of giving full callsigns. Congrats on an excellent job Bernie and thank y
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-09/msg00062.html (7,307 bytes)

80. [CQ-Contest] Why Compete? (score: 1)
Author: jono@enteract.com (Jon Ogden)
Date: Wed Sep 15 18:10:00 1999
Why is contesting to get an award for the wrong reason? I compete to win. Or at least I hope to and so do lots of other contestors. Otherwise why compete? Competition is fun because someone wins. And
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-09/msg00070.html (7,235 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu