Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jukka.klemola@nokia.com: 131 ]

Total 131 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Multi-Single Rule (score: 1)
Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:56:31 +0300
... I have discussed this issue live with EST. Bob said my approach back then was not entirely correct. I submitted two log files to WW, the other being a checklog for the QSOs I wanted to be 'zero v
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00112.html (10,144 bytes)

102. Re: [CQ-Contest] KLM 20M5 (score: 1)
Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 09:44:20 +0300
I suggest buying the latest yagi optimizer, that gives best results even with KLM type feed. ..if only one could tell where one can get the latest YO.. STI has been very silent for quite a long time.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00028.html (8,301 bytes)

103. Re: [CQ-Contest] UBN/Log disclosure (was: Re: RES: D4B QRT) (score: 1)
Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 23:37:52 +0300
... I share this opinion. That is my personal opinion. If someone opposes, please explain why. Please explain how you can tell the rule has been followed. What if somebody sends in the assisted log
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00164.html (8,648 bytes)

104. Re: [CQ-Contest] UBN/Log disclosure (was: Re: RES: D4B QRT) (score: 1)
Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 09:11:59 +0300
Good European Morning, I was guessing my idea would be miscopied, but I sent the message as it was. I rephrashe: I am sure the assisted category will vanish by merging into single op category as the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00180.html (10,718 bytes)

105. Re: [CQ-Contest] After public logs... (score: 1)
Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 00:07:59 +0300
... Marko, There is an example even closer than you think: http://www.sk3bg.se/contest/res/r04sacsn.htm And there is more information on Jan, SM3CER, pages. Like CQ subscription? ARRL membership RSG
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00213.html (8,802 bytes)

106. Re: [CQ-Contest] Competing in the Daylight (score: 1)
Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 17:25:23 +0300
... There are a few individuals collecting logs already for databases. Those databases are free. Maybe also the logs could be free? There will be a variety of these if it is the one collecting logs
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00247.html (9,289 bytes)

107. Re: [CQ-Contest] Competing in the Daylight (score: 1)
Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:01:32 +0300
Should we encourage the DX to self spot so they would get the pile up? Or do we say self spotting expedition QSOs are no good for DXCC? I believe the OF community will vote for the latter. Younger ha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00264.html (11,193 bytes)

108. Re: [CQ-Contest] D4B QRT (score: 1)
Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 22:16:58 +0300
... ... My two cents (euro cents, that is): The contest of the contests is coming. The CQWW cannot be changed. We have WAE that is now one of the front runners, admitting we are not using AM anymore
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00346.html (9,826 bytes)

109. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ Certificates (score: 1)
Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:26:03 +0300
Gosh ! The Contest of the contests is here ! This is a GREAT ad for the CQWW SSB ! I bet the public is now waiting for some sort of a reply from the other major contests: ARRL DX, WPX, RDXC, IARU ..
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00403.html (8,549 bytes)

110. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Contest Country Files - 26 October 2005[lastbeforeCQWW] (score: 1)
Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:57:36 +0300
Teijo, Hams do not look at rivers. We have other awards for water-related things. Oblast boundaries rule. CQ kick ... All UA9 oblasts are in Asia. Log what you hear and if what you hear does not make
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00590.html (8,172 bytes)

111. Re: [CQ-Contest] How low will they go? (score: 1)
Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 22:39:43 +0200
I was glad to be able to hear so many stations on 40. Kind-of allocation is 60kHz but there are non-hams stopping us from using the whole band. If the 40 kHz that we are allowed, would have been used
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00697.html (7,717 bytes)

112. Re: [CQ-Contest] An Observation (score: 1)
Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 15:20:25 +0200
Listen to the words: 'faaiv' 'naain' They are pretty close and if there is QRM, asking is more heatlhy than getting the likely penalty points. Same goes for two. If there is any air going to mic in t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00023.html (10,075 bytes)

113. Re: [CQ-Contest] Phonetics (score: 1)
Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 10:36:46 +0200
... 59 ! Let's see if someone will have the courage to do this. I will propose this to group of people behind the SAC. Don't get solo ownership of this idea as there are us others who want to share
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00110.html (10,119 bytes)

114. Re: [CQ-Contest] Which would make better stubs? (score: 1)
Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 16:18:11 +0200
1/2" 50 ohm hardline works pretty well if you can get any surplus cable from some cell phone base station installing company. 73, Jukka OH6LI ... ... _______________________________________________ C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00223.html (8,462 bytes)

115. Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposed Rule Change - CQWW PHONE (score: 1)
Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:02:23 +0200
... Just a few years ago I remember 21090 - 21450 was packed. And I mean packed. It was an impossible mess. Also, 28200-28790 was packed a few years ago. Ham hommy is a hobby with No Limits! .. othe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00271.html (9,152 bytes)

116. Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposed Rule Change - CQWW PHONE - SK (score: 1)
Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:00:06 +0200
I oppose... Providing the question is unnecessarily resticting the allowed usage of 40m in R1. Jukka OH6LI _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00473.html (8,260 bytes)

117. Re: [CQ-Contest] Memorable SS Fun-etics (score: 1)
Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 22:01:40 +0200
Super has superiourly drier S than the sh-like sugar. What a mouth-moisturizer!? I use a MFJ box with refreshed buttons for producing the "callsign and schontest" message as the original buttons wore
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00624.html (9,531 bytes)

118. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2005 SS SSB - Band Summary 23Nov2005 (score: 1)
Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 22:38:45 +0200
Is this for real ? The invisible glass ceiling has been found ! 73, Jukka OH6LI ... ... ... _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://li
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00654.html (7,617 bytes)

119. Re: [CQ-Contest] Phonetics, back to basics (score: 1)
Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 22:46:22 +0200
... Florida is easier to say than Foxtrot. A lot easier. One can potentially copy it better, too. At least if you have some R in the FloRida. Bravo is OK to most, I think. At least if you use some R
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00655.html (8,080 bytes)

120. Re: [CQ-Contest] new ooops ! - WOW - (score: 1)
Author: <jukka.klemola@nokia.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 13:41:07 +0200
I rephrased this email's subject to new ooops ! - WOW - ... ... ... Come on ! We all have been young and so in-perfect. We have developed a medicine for this. At OH4A we have developed our skills so
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00700.html (8,016 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu