Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jvarn359@yahoo.com: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] Determining ASSISTED vs NON-ASSISTED -- was: =>RE: Cheating and bad journalism (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:15:00 -0700 (PDT)
"Seems to me that ASSISTED or NOT-ASSISTED is splitting hairs - some choose to use a tool and others not, much the same as some choose to log on a computer and others on paper. Perhaps there needs to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00232.html (8,114 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Determining ASSISTED vs NON-ASSISTED -- was: =>RE:Cheating and bad journalism (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 08:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
"A panadapter or bandscope gathers no callsigns or other station information, just a general view of band conditions." Right, but imagine it's Sunday, late in a contest and you're S&P'ing for new sta
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00238.html (8,922 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Determining ASSISTED vs NON-ASSISTED -- was: =>RE:Cheating and bad journalism (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 20:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
"Clearly there remains a misunderstanding about what the "Assisted" class means within the context of Amateur Radio Contesting. "Assistance" has always indicated that the Operator(s) has received inf
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-09/msg00267.html (9,634 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] Two Reasons Why Assisted and Unassisted Should Be Merged (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 20:55:17 -0800 (PST)
I'm a relative newcomer, licensed in '09, small pistol. I admit I have little or no clue about a lot of contesting history or some of the traditions; I respect them, but I admit I don't know all of t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00581.html (9,294 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Two Reasons Why Assisted and Unassisted Should Be Merged (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 21:40:02 -0800 (PST)
Good point. I was only looking at worldwide scores. I should not have brought up "Assisted never wins" to support my argument that Assisted and Unassisted could be merged without harm. A rigorous and
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00031.html (8,701 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer had finally arrived (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:48:28 -0800 (PST)
That's exactly what I experimented with -- "Erase'n'Pounce". My plan for ARRL DX was to operate off and on and then submit a checklog. This freed me up to play around (staying within the rules of cou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-02/msg00183.html (8,853 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Aniother rules/remote RX issue (score: 1)
Author: JVarney <jvarn359@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 08:10:46 -0700 (PDT)
Except it's not that simple because the clusters assist the unassisted. A single operator travels to a rare multiplier and calls CQ. He or she is immediately spotted on the clusters. This instant fre
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00045.html (9,761 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu