Mail Archive Search: <+from:k0wa@southwind.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:k0wa@southwind.net: 70 ]

Total 70 documents matching your query.

41. [CQ-Contest] Ideal Transceiver Discussion (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Thu Jul 10 09:39:04 1997; Guys and Gals...you missed the point of the discussion. I don't want to discuss the finer points of already existing rigs. Everyone knows those things ad naseum. What I want to discuss is what you wo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00088.html (8,148 bytes)
42. [CQ-Contest] Re: Computer vs paper (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Fri Jul 11 09:55:28 1997; The computer is great and I will never go back to paper. Why? I never want to re-dupe another contest ever again. I just about gave up contesting until NA,CT and TR log came along. What I want is to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00110.html (9,153 bytes)
43. [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes legends (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Fri Jul 11 09:38:01 1997; I worked a lot of the guys and gals that have been mentioned here, but never met them personally. The guy that really cranked me up several notches in contesting was Dean Lewis, WA0TKJ. He is now K9Z; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00111.html (9,654 bytes)
44. [CQ-Contest] Summary - Ideal Transceiver Discussion (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Fri Jul 25 17:04:50 1997; Several weeks ago, I posted a message to discuss what would be included in the ideal transceiver. I proposed the following features that should be incorporated into the Ideal Transceiver. I've tried; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00259.html (12,695 bytes)
45. [CQ-Contest] Ideal Transceiver Discussion (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Wed Jul 9 10:53:16 1997; A friend of mine just purchased an ICOM 765 and I have been looking at my TS850 with a jaundice eye. Should I trade? Should I move from Kenwood to something else. I've been a Kenwood guy since the 52; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00319.html (9,413 bytes)
46. [CQ-Contest] Ideal Transceiver Discussion (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Thu Jul 10 09:39:04 1997; Guys and Gals...you missed the point of the discussion. I don't want to discuss the finer points of already existing rigs. Everyone knows those things ad naseum. What I want to discuss is what you wo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00335.html (8,143 bytes)
47. [CQ-Contest] Re: Computer vs paper (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Fri Jul 11 09:55:28 1997; The computer is great and I will never go back to paper. Why? I never want to re-dupe another contest ever again. I just about gave up contesting until NA,CT and TR log came along. What I want is to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00357.html (9,249 bytes)
48. [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes legends (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Fri Jul 11 09:38:01 1997; I worked a lot of the guys and gals that have been mentioned here, but never met them personally. The guy that really cranked me up several notches in contesting was Dean Lewis, WA0TKJ. He is now K9Z; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00358.html (9,497 bytes)
49. [CQ-Contest] Summary - Ideal Transceiver Discussion (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Fri Jul 25 17:04:50 1997; Several weeks ago, I posted a message to discuss what would be included in the ideal transceiver. I proposed the following features that should be incorporated into the Ideal Transceiver. I've tried; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00496.html (12,683 bytes)
50. [CQ-Contest] Ideal Transceiver Discussion (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Wed Jul 9 10:53:16 1997; A friend of mine just purchased an ICOM 765 and I have been looking at my TS850 with a jaundice eye. Should I trade? Should I move from Kenwood to something else. I've been a Kenwood guy since the 52; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00552.html (9,401 bytes)
51. [CQ-Contest] Ideal Transceiver Discussion (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Thu Jul 10 09:39:04 1997; Guys and Gals...you missed the point of the discussion. I don't want to discuss the finer points of already existing rigs. Everyone knows those things ad naseum. What I want to discuss is what you wo; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00568.html (8,140 bytes)
52. [CQ-Contest] Re: Computer vs paper (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Fri Jul 11 09:55:28 1997; The computer is great and I will never go back to paper. Why? I never want to re-dupe another contest ever again. I just about gave up contesting until NA,CT and TR log came along. What I want is to; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00590.html (9,236 bytes)
53. [CQ-Contest] Sweepstakes legends (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Fri Jul 11 09:38:01 1997; I worked a lot of the guys and gals that have been mentioned here, but never met them personally. The guy that really cranked me up several notches in contesting was Dean Lewis, WA0TKJ. He is now K9Z; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00591.html (9,392 bytes)
54. [CQ-Contest] Summary - Ideal Transceiver Discussion (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Fri Jul 25 17:04:50 1997; Several weeks ago, I posted a message to discuss what would be included in the ideal transceiver. I proposed the following features that should be incorporated into the Ideal Transceiver. I've tried; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-07/msg00731.html (12,657 bytes)
55. [CQ-Contest] 1 radio vs. 2 radios (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Fri Aug 8 09:53:41 1997; Several random thoughts... You know, that is an interesting paragraph above. I have been trying to deal with the concept of two radios and I find it to be annoying. I guess by old brain can't separat; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-08/msg00049.html (9,512 bytes)
56. [CQ-Contest] 1 radio vs. 2 radios (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Fri Aug 8 09:53:41 1997; Several random thoughts... You know, that is an interesting paragraph above. I have been trying to deal with the concept of two radios and I find it to be annoying. I guess by old brain can't separat; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-08/msg00163.html (9,389 bytes)
57. [CQ-Contest] 1 radio vs. 2 radios (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Fri Aug 8 09:53:41 1997; Several random thoughts... You know, that is an interesting paragraph above. I have been trying to deal with the concept of two radios and I find it to be annoying. I guess by old brain can't separat; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-08/msg00274.html (9,297 bytes)
58. [CQ-Contest] Filter combos for CW contesting (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Thu Sep 18 12:48:38 1997; I agree. A 250 Hz filter is to narrow for me. One of the best filters I've ever used was between my eares....but sometimes with age that filter degrades. I really have learned how to use Band Pass Tu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-09/msg00119.html (9,841 bytes)
59. [CQ-Contest] Filter combos for CW contesting (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Thu Sep 18 12:48:38 1997; I agree. A 250 Hz filter is to narrow for me. One of the best filters I've ever used was between my eares....but sometimes with age that filter degrades. I really have learned how to use Band Pass Tu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-09/msg00347.html (9,846 bytes)
60. [CQ-Contest] Filter combos for CW contesting (score: 1): Author: k0wa@southwind.net (Lee Buller); Date: Thu Sep 18 12:48:38 1997; I agree. A 250 Hz filter is to narrow for me. One of the best filters I've ever used was between my eares....but sometimes with age that filter degrades. I really have learned how to use Band Pass Tu; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-09/msg00458.html (9,826 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]