Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k0xu@longlines.com: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CAT for IC 775 and TS 870 (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@longlines.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:29:30 -0500
If I am not mistaken, the 870 uses the same system as my 570. A db9 serial port on the back panel for direct connection for CAT control. Jim Rhodes K0XU jim@rhodesend.net Experience is the thing you
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00186.html (8,210 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Coax Stubs with Tribanders (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@longlines.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 23:27:36 -0600
K1TTT has some references on his site: http://www.k1ttt.net/technote/techref.html Under the heading "Filters" Jim Rhodes K0XU jim@rhodesend.net Experience is the thing you have left when everything e
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00369.html (8,867 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting using remote stations (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@longlines.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:41:23 -0500
It certainly does not. It makes no statement about remote stations, other than to imply that they are allowed. It does not say that the operator has to be within the 500 ft circle, just the transmitt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00417.html (10,212 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] More Cheating (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@longlines.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:24:14 -0500
Actually I find it hard to understand that no one has mentioned that this is not cheating, this is illegal operation. Jim Rhodes K0XU jim@rhodesend.net Experience is the thing you have left when ever
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00286.html (9,265 bytes)

5. Re: [RTTY] [CQ-Contest] 2009 schedule conflict (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@longlines.com>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 05:39:22 -0500
No Shelby, you are looking at the 2008 calendar. In 2009 they are all on Feb 21-22. Jim Rhodes K0XU jim@rhodesend.net Experience is the thing you have left when everything else is gone. _____________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-05/msg00078.html (8,936 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@longlines.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:39:35 -0600
You left off the part of the definition that says "to equalize the chances of the competitors". Using your partial definition then those with long calls are handicapped in ALL contests. But in your d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00339.html (11,152 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] The dupes? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@longlines.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:54:07 -0600
When someone tells me "QSO B4" I just spin the dial and let them get the NIL in their log. Maybe some day they will learn. No skin off me & they get any penalty. Takes too long to argue, I might miss
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00304.html (8,702 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] PU2FAN, etc (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@longlines.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:59:52 -0600
Maybe the proper message should be that the rules don't matter? Is that the bigger picture? And Dave was supposed to know the entire situation before he posted the list. Get real, the kid unknowingly
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00456.html (10,705 bytes)

9. Re: [CQ-Contest] Slashed Zero Fonts: DO NOT DO THIS!!!! (score: 1)
Author: Jim Rhodes <k0xu@longlines.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 10:10:02 -0500
Using a slashed zero font does not change the data, only what shows on YOUR screen. An ascii 48 is still an ascii 48, it just shows up on you screen with a slash through or a dot in the middle of the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-08/msg00229.html (9,259 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu