Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k1kaa@arrl.net: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of di-di-dah-dah-di-dit in CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Mike DeChristopher, K1KAA" <k1kaa@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 10:09:14 -0400
Some people get very frustrated when S&P'ers send a "?" after their CQ. You'll get the callsign in a second or two; I don't think it will kill the rate. In fact, sending "?" and waiting for him to se
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00155.html (9,847 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Use of di-di-dah-dah-di-dit in CW Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Mike DeChristopher, K1KAA" <k1kaa@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2008 14:34:42 -0400
Hi Bob, Getting "?" doesn't bother me. I usually do about the same (hit F4). If it happens too often, I re-record F1 to be sure of the clarity. I have no problem! I do know it bothers others for what
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00167.html (12,815 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Drugs, Sleep and Contesting (score: 1)
Author: "Mike DeChristopher" <k1kaa@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 22:49:54 -0400 (EDT)
Could this be the beginning of contesting's "steroid era"? Mandatory pre-contest screenings? Hearings and Mitchell Reports?? Hihi, good idea Pete et al. It might also be worth mentioning the timing o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00186.html (11,124 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu