I would only have 2 stations on the air at a time, but the raw log would number them 1 through 6... to satisfy the log submission requirement I would have to take 1 through 6 and renumber them just 1
It may result in lots of NILs in the log checking when they can't match up the sent and received callsigns. David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net AR-Cluster node
What do you know, got 100 countries on 80m now on lotw... makes 5 bands, phone, cw, mixed. Ok, maybe now I should apply for dxcc, never bothered with it before, just hate sorting cards and all that c
Because its not cqww cw or phone? David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net ___________________________________
Yes, it is mostly to keep it interesting for the ops. There are not nearly as many rtty contesters as cw or ssb so having extra multipliers and making it possible to work everyone keeps it more fun.
Just a simple report this time since i didn't find a lot of interesting stuff to report. A bit of cheerleading this time: spotter dx Spots total Pct YO4REC YO3BL 30 31 96.77 LU2NI KH9/W0CN 27 33 81.8
My node is so busy that I had to install the ve7cc proxy program that buffers the connections to the node. The ar-cluster software (actually any windows based telnet program not running on a real ser
Well, I think there are a couple reasons. One big one is reliability. My node used to be one of the more reliable ones, though today I think there are lots of others that are probably at least as goo
The concept has been around for a while actually. http://www.k1ttt.net/images/prop3.gif David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telne
You are right, the prop program featured on the web page is for prediction. But there is an older part that is rarely used that extracts hourly maps from a log to display actual openings which that g
Nope, my analysis relies on spotting those who are actively abusing the spotting network. It is up to the contest committees to take the raw spot data and compare with actual logs to catch the singl
don't worry, most of it is interesting but not all that useful in the long run. The most important thing is making sure you keep getting on the air giving out that rare wy multiplier! David Robbins
I have been publishing real time scores for the last year or so in the big contests. I am afraid of real time logs though as some will call those ways to solicit contacts by publicizing your run freq
No, it is impossible to tell for sure from log data who is stealing spots and claiming unassisted. The only way is to have someone looking over the shoulder of unassisted ops as they do in wrtc. The
It is important to check the messages that the log robots send back to you. They mean that your log may be malformed in such a way that the log checking process may not be able to properly score your
You can schedule tasks in windows down to every minute if you want. That is what I used to use to copy the text score file that n1mmlogger can generate to my web server... now I just use n1mm to put
It may make sense to you, but it is not a logical way to find offenders. How do you fix the 'X' time period? Pick 10 minutes, if a rare multiplier is getting spotted every 2 minutes or more often som
You must have a short memory... think back, way back, before packet pileups... what caused pileups back then?? easy, two stations call, a third hears them and calls, then another hears the extra rack
If you have evidence and put it out logically it does not start a name calling contest. I have been doing it with my packet reports for years and haven't seen it happen at all. So get with it! IF yo
Come on mal, one contact does not a cheating pattern make... lets have some real data! David Robbins K1TTT e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net web: http://www.k1ttt.net AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet