Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k1vu@tmlp.com: 45 ]

Total 45 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] May CQ Amateur Radio out yet ??? (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 16:02:19 -0400
Hi: Has anyone received their May issue of CQ Amateur Radio yet ??? It seems that I should have received it 2 or 3 weeks ago. It usually comes between the 15th and 20th of the month. TNX Bob, K1VU __
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00059.html (7,390 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Answer to Missing May CQ Amateur Radio (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 21:58:11 -0400
Hi: Just before I took may out for supper I called CQ Publishing. I was told that the "PRINTER" forgot to mail the May Issue !!! Oh Well, I guess sometimes "The Dog Really Did Eat the Homework" !! I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00065.html (7,129 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Bill Windle Operating Event (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 22:15:39 -0400
OK, I give up. What does FOC stand for ??? I Googled FOC 6 ways from Sunday and didn't come with anything to do with Ham Radio. TNX es 73 Still Googling Bob, K1VU ____________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00072.html (10,723 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] 40M "Woodpecker" (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:07:04 -0400
Is this what you were looking for ??? 73 Bob, K1VU -Original-To: cq-contest@contesting.com Delivered-To: cq-contest@contesting.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dayton.akorn.net
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00205.html (14,395 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] e qsl (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 13:07:16 -0400
You have the ability to "REJECT" a QSO in eQSL, which is more than LoTW provides. Most of the time it's due to a busted call. I have K1VV and K1VUT in my area. All 3 of us are contesters. In CW if yo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-04/msg00444.html (8,350 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] RCA(PHONO) JACK TO PL-259 ADAPTOR? (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2004 14:01:42 -0500
I used a Radio Shack BNC to RCA adaptor on the amp end and a BNC to UHF on the rig end and just connected them with a RG-58 BNC to BNC Jumper. 73 es GL Bob, K1VU -- The world's top contesters battle
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00035.html (9,738 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] LOTW question (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2004 14:10:00 -0500
Simple solution (time wise) is to mail the CD to the LOTW people. I believe that this was one of the options of submission. 73 es GL Bob, K1VU -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00036.html (9,808 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] Canadian Sect. and Mult. Confusion (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 20:43:43 -0500
Below are the extracts from the ARRL sponsored contests showing the CAN multipliers. These are taken from the Contest Rules on the ARRL Web Site. This lack of consistency is creating much confusion a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00097.html (11,211 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Incomplete LoTW QSL Records, Worthless ??? (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 22:39:54 -0500
Hi: I had originally posted this message on the LoTW reflector. Several hams suggested that I might that I might also want to post this message on some other mailing lists so that more would be aware
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00103.html (11,213 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Incomplete LoTW QSL Records, Worthless ??? (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 20:43:53 -0500
Hi Mal: Your missing my point. It has nothing to do with how or what logging program was used. People are not including ALL of their "Station" data when setting up TQSL !!! Assume that I did not fill
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00123.html (15,331 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] More NCJ Sprints ??? (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 18:44:52 -0500
What "Name Changing Rule" ??? I downloaded the NA Sprint rules from the NCJ web site and I don't see it. What Rule # was it ??? 73 Bob, K1VU -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! TH
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00190.html (11,439 bytes)

12. [ct-user] Re: [YCCC] CTY files release 2 March 2004 (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 20:27:39 -0500
Hi Jim: Is cty-1304.zip the correct/latest Version # ??? Looking at my Download File cty-1304.zip was dated 11/23/2003@18:18PM ! 73 Bob, K1VU _______________________________________________ CT-User m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00023.html (9,169 bytes)

13. RE: [CQ-Contest] NCJ Topic: Peace Dividend (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 21:53:06 -0500
Yes, but in this day and age, why would you want to run a Tetrode if you could run a Triode (unless you're CW only) ??? With all of the Svetlana tubes available, I would be looking at their 3CX serie
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-03/msg00485.html (11,039 bytes)

14. RE: [CQ-Contest] The good old U.S. holiday weekend contest debate (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2004 18:00:57 -0400
Hi Dick: Now I could live with that change !!! Single Mode op's shouldn't care. Multi Mode op's shouldn't care. Propargation shouldn't care. Now the big BITCH could be: Which contest first for the fi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-04/msg00106.html (10,633 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL Membership/QST Readership Survey (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 21:00:39 -0400
Hi Jim: Do you know if there is a link to that article ??? Seeing that the ARRL has messed up my membership for 2 years in a row, I have refused to join up again after 33 years as a member. I sure wo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00113.html (9,398 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] LotW and Casual Guys (was Needs More Participation) (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 13:29:08 -0400
Al: I certainly agree with your assessment that "Contesters and dx-pedetions are only 20% of the picture" and "The *casual* guy is the key to LOTW's success". Unfortunately in my experience, the LoTW
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-05/msg00269.html (12,054 bytes)

17. [CQ-Contest] Anyone work ever Nunavut,(NU} from 1 Land ??? (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 21:45:21 -0400
Not to many Hams up there or DxPerditons to Nunavut in VY0 !!! Anyone got them in their log from W1 land ??? 73 Bob, K1VU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-06/msg00281.html (7,207 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Destroyed equipment in France (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 20:22:57 -0500
Hi: Looks like Inspector Clouseau still lives !!! Only the Frogs, Ahh sorry French, could execute this Faux Pas !!! The translation of "Faux Pas" as was given to me was "F.CK Up" Nice going to those
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00357.html (10,397 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] New Version LoTW Released Aug 18 (score: 1)
Author: k1vu@tmlp.com (R Johnson)
Date: Mon Aug 18 17:12:24 2003
New Version of LoTW released today, Aug 18, 2003 Go to http://www.arrl.org/lotw/#develop and look for tqsl-104.exe, V1.04rc installer (95/98/Me/NT/2000/XP) If you installed an earlier beta version, y
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-08/msg00280.html (6,442 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] LoTW Usage - Will you use it??? (score: 1)
Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 18:29:41 -0400
Yes !!! As a "Little Gun" all I can say is I'll be using LoTW after every Contest I work!!! My next question is WHAT is the cost for applying to ARRL Awards ??? LoTW Is FREE to use and UPLOAD your Q'
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-09/msg00289.html (11,481 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu