Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k3bu@optimum.net: 85 ]

Total 85 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi-Single Band Change Rule - I vote NO! (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optimum.net
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:27:41 +0000 (GMT)
and change will facilitate increase in scores in order to preserve the validity, continuation of records. Yuri, K3BU.us _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00355.html (7,696 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] Multi-Single Band Change Rule - I vote NO! (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optimum.net
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:41:47 +0000 (GMT)
In case there is interpretation to the contrary, I support KQ2M statement and extending it by ...and.... which to me agrees with what he was saying and adding that if any changes to rules are made th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00364.html (8,367 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2010 WPX Rule Change Review (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optimum.net
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:17:29 +0000 (GMT)
Let's go even further: Why bother with records, scores, competition. Just do it PC style, so nobody's feelings are hurt - everybody is a winer, no need to even publish the scores. You ever tried to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00022.html (8,634 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] IARU R1 IARU contest scoring change (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optimum.net
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:00:56 +0000 (GMT)
Plus, especially in Eu, HQ stations park high power CQer machines across the band leaving few "clear" frequencies for little and medium pistols. HQ multiplier = baaad idea. Yuri K3BU.us www.MVmanor.c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00056.html (8,907 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] anti-contest petition MMSN (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optimum.net
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:07:54 +0000 (GMT)
It's not just MMSN, but other QRU nut nets claiming ownership of frequencies during the contests. In case of MMSN, why don't they just monitor the frequency during the contest, I am sure if there was
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00057.html (10,601 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules? (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optimum.net
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 04:14:27 +0000 (GMT)
Fellow contesters, The big dilemma with CQ WW is that it grew to become the biggest and most prestigious contest, while having discriminatory scoring system, which is fine for those (leave it alone)
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-12/msg00357.html (12,062 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why do we like our favorite contesting mode? (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optimum.net
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:00:33 +0000 (GMT)
I think Rick hit the nail on the head. SSB mode contests are cacophony of QRM, splatter, wide signals. While CW contests with available options of filtering, narrow band, weak signal detection, no ne
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-01/msg00033.html (10,309 bytes)

28. [CQ-Contest] NNJ to Dayton ride? (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optimum.net
Date: Sun, 09 May 2010 23:24:58 +0000 (GMT)
Anyone from NNJ willing to take a rider or join the ride from Parsippany NJ area to Dayton on May 13, returning May 16? Please let me know Yuri K3BU@optimum.net ______________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-05/msg00065.html (6,612 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optimum.net
Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 15:45:38 +0000 (GMT)
Yo, yo I was awaken by experiences of Team Vertical exploits at the beach and their results by just using "fishing pole" antennas. To verify their fishing stories I ventured to Cape Hatteras with 10m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-05/msg00153.html (10,517 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optimum.net
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 02:20:05 +0000 (GMT)
W4ZV: Not true. Even horizontally polarized antennas gain from the salt water. Besides enhancement from the ground, reflection conditions in the immediate vicinity of the array, signals at the salt w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-05/msg00158.html (8,716 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contest QTH (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optimum.net
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 20:52:47 +0000 (GMT)
Maybe déjà vu of déjà vu, but my further observations by "my own lying eyes" over the "unshakable truth" of software models tells me otherwise. There is much more to the salty beach than dBs in soft
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-05/msg00179.html (11,436 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2010 IARU Pre-checking your log... (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optimum.net
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 01:26:25 +0000 (GMT)
CW with low power and narrower bandwidth can still get decent runs (5 stns/1 kHz) IARU is turning into HQ's contest. 73 Yuri K3BU.us _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00211.html (8,661 bytes)

33. [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2014 Selection Criteria (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optimum.net
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 13:45:44 +0000 (GMT)
Maybe it is time to consider the following suggestions: 1. Selection qualification runs - have Continental CRTC a year before the WRTC. Continental Top scorers in CRTC will go on to the next WRTC. No
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-10/msg00053.html (8,287 bytes)

34. [CQ-Contest] WPX top band records updated (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optimum.net
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 16:16:23 +0000 (GMT)
Please check the updated Top Band records for CQ WPX contest.http://www.k3bu.us/topband_records.htmAny omissions or corrections, please let me know. Congrats to new record holders, good luck and cond
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00208.html (6,950 bytes)

35. Re: Topband: Updated WPX Top Band records (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optimum.net
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 13:56:39 +0000 (GMT)
http://www.k3bu.us/cq_ww_wpx.htm Howdy WPXers, Here are the up-updated CQ WW WPX records for 160m. Empty slot for SSB is for Africa LP, one QSO would make a history :-) We can spruce up the record ta
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-03/msg00231.html (7,279 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] Club/Group competition (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optimum.net
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 01:51:27 +0000 (GMT)
Howdy Contestadores! Why not have (Club) TEAM Category: Bunch of contesters from the same country or club decide to form the CLUB TEAM. Say, have 10/6 all/mono (single op?) band entries, need to "reg
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-04/msg00160.html (9,378 bytes)

37. [CQ-Contest] Tesla Radiofest BBQ (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optimum.net
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:32:10 +0000 (GMT)
Howdy Radio Aficionados Life keeps throwing obstacles to my radio life, keeping me from devoting more of my life to beloved ham radio. Making me to move to another country, just when I seem to mature
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00144.html (8,985 bytes)

38. Topband: Tesla Radiofest BBQ July 23 (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optimum.net
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 01:22:45 +0000 (GMT)
Howdy Radio Friends, Tesla RC is inviting radio aficionados to its Radiofest BBQ on Saturday, July 23 at MountainView Manor, Glen Spey, NY between 1:00 and 6:00 pm. Come and see the magnificent place
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00157.html (7,080 bytes)

39. [CQ-Contest] Tesla RC BBQ July 23 (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optimum.net
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 19:06:55 +0000 (GMT)
Howdy Radio Friends, contesters Tesla RC is inviting radio aficionados to its Radiofest BBQ on Saturday, July 23 at MountainView Manor, Glen Spey, NY between 1:00 and 6:00 pm. Come and see the magnif
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00165.html (7,138 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] WPX & Activity (Was: Intended consequences) (score: 1)
Author: Yuri Blanarovich <k3bu@optimum.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 21:19:14 -0400
Excellent 'splanation why WPX has become more fun, more popular. Off times in the contest should be around 3 - 6 hours per 24 hour segment, for the reasons Bob outlined. When people go on "expedition
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00185.html (13,198 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu