Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k3bu@optonline.net: 81 ]

Total 81 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] It Is What It Is (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optonline.net
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:39:25 +0000 (GMT)
Weird "Ham Radio Logic" as applied to NYC Marathon: You got 26 miles to run (oops, to compete) Africans and South Americans will start at mile 17, Europeans at mile 0, US competitors at mile minus 7
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00023.html (12,295 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] why Unlimited [aka Assisted]? (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optonline.net
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 14:06:45 +0000 (GMT)
Why do people use crutches? Same reason for whatever assisted. (Hint: Those who can run on their own can outrun those on crutches :-) Yuri, K3BU _______________________________________________ CQ-Con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00269.html (7,342 bytes)

43. [CQ-Contest] Assisted (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optonline.net
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 15:16:07 +0000 (GMT)
I think the discussion about "Assisted" category and assistance in the contests is getting off the track. I understand that "assisted" or assisting operator refers to activities and means of gatherin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00573.html (7,891 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] Live Audio - K5ZD for CQ WW CW (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optonline.net
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:53:52 +0000 (GMT)
Hmmmm, like soliciting contest QSOs by non-amateur means? New category - stations with live cameras, live streaming and instant messaging and boards among the club members. Let the games (discussion
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00640.html (7,576 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] Live Audio - K5ZD for CQ WW CW (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optonline.net
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 04:46:12 +0000 (GMT)
Posting on Internet (non-amateur means) that station will be using live streaming of own audio, where you can hear yourself working that station in real time (~15 sec delay). So if I am casual conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00668.html (8,235 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] Live Audio - K5ZD for CQ WW CW (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optonline.net
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:43:49 +0000 (GMT)
Streaming audio or video IS DURING the contest and soliciting stations to "work me" (and hear yourself - reward). Additional "advertising" is before the contest - making it known "I will be on, strea
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00694.html (11,736 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] Live Audio - K5ZD for CQ WW CW (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optonline.net
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 18:16:47 +0000 (GMT)
Very funny! Or not!?! I just marvel at the remnants of the logic left in some hams. Having web site is NOT the same as SOLICITING QSO by saying: "Hey I will be on, have streaming audio (video), give
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00695.html (11,151 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] Live Audio - K5ZD for CQ WW CW (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optonline.net
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:44:48 +0000 (GMT)
OK, I get it - you don't get it or purposely obfuscating the point. It is not about me (serious operator), it is about soliciting contacts by non-amateur means: "Give me a call and hear yourself, wh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00713.html (10,701 bytes)

49. [CQ-Contest] Un-assited as assisted (was Live Audio - K5ZD for CQWW CW) (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optonline.net
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 15:31:49 +0000 (GMT)
Are we getting into another grey area (interpret, any way you like it)? Is it "against the law" to claim different category, one that is above or within the rules for it? As far as I am aware, it is
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00780.html (11,606 bytes)

50. [CQ-Contest] 160m Records (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optonline.net
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 05:43:57 +0000 (GMT)
Just updated CW and SSB CQ WW 160 m contest records. Bunch of them were shattered on CW, but SSB just few, propagation wasn't all that good, scores were down in 2006. Congrats to all "breakers"! I w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00274.html (7,959 bytes)

51. [CQ-Contest] Top Band Contest records updated. (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optonline.net
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:36:35 +0000 (GMT)
Top Band Contest records have been updated, including 2006 CQ WW 160 m Contest. Please check it out at http://members.aol.com/k3bu/160Records.htm Congratulations to all the new record setters! If the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00288.html (6,887 bytes)

52. Re: [CQ-Contest] "wouldn't it be neat if..." (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optonline.net
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:03:32 +0000 (GMT)
...and now take a deeeeeeep breath and wait 9 moooooonths for the results. Welcome to instant amateur radio contesting!!! 73 Yuri, K3BU _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mai
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00345.html (7,742 bytes)

53. Re: [CQ-Contest] Simple on-time / off-time calculations (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optonline.net
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:16:34 +0000 (GMT)
What's next? How aboutit: New improved rules for all contests: All contestants have to have their station and computer clocks synchronized to GPS signals (+-1 sec). All loging software must have sec
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00444.html (8,719 bytes)

54. Re: [CQ-Contest] Incorrect conclusions about un-assisted versusassisted (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optonline.net
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 03:06:24 +0000 (GMT)
The top operators pay attention to station and antenna setup. That gives them edge by having better ears/signals, which allows them to work the stuff before the packeteers get to it and the followin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00481.html (10,495 bytes)

55. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Unassisted Myth (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optonline.net
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:59:55 +0000 (GMT)
For those who still don't get it: Ham radio contesting is a technical sport involving technology - equipment, skills to assemble the station (yourself or purchased) AND (one or more) operator skills
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00534.html (12,857 bytes)

56. Re: [CQ-Contest] Tracing the Evolution of the Single Op and readingthe tea leaves. (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optonline.net
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:53:37 +0000 (GMT)
If you asked your buddies to be spotted, then you are soliciting QSOs by non amateur means (Internet plus other even amateur means), then you should be DQed. K1TTT has done some detective work in th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00545.html (10,394 bytes)

57. [CQ-Contest] ZERO points (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optonline.net
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 05:13:30 +0000 (GMT)
Your really think that ZERO points for own country applies EQUALLY to all contestants, like to VP9 and W/K/N, or JAs, or OMs etc? OK, let me 'splain again and once for all, what the "fascination" wi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00566.html (15,058 bytes)

58. Re: [CQ-Contest] ZERO points (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optonline.net
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:27:59 +0000 (GMT)
Ok, I will give up! After I wrote explanation of desirability and reasons for removing zero point scoring bias, some don't get it and looks like they will never get it. You do not need handicap, we n
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00591.html (10,903 bytes)

59. Re: [CQ-Contest] ZERO points (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optonline.net
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:53:24 +0000 (GMT)
In response to UA9CDC comments: We are talking here about CQ WW and its scoring system, if the US and other large countries were not penalized with zero points, there would be more activity, again WP
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00592.html (9,849 bytes)

60. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Unassisted Myth - Now the Rest of the Story:The Assisted Myth (?) (score: 1)
Author: k3bu@optonline.net
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:08:57 +0000 (GMT)
How would having at least 1 point per domestic QSO change that? Let me look into the crystal ball: Opprotunity to work some 2000 stations more, work some stuff when bands are dead to other directions
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00593.html (9,948 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu