Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k3fiv@arrl.net: 69 ]

Total 69 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [CQ-Contest] "Transmitter" use rule (score: 1)
Author: Jack Haverty <k3fiv@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:35:15 -0700
I've done the same. But my point was to encourage the rulemakers to include as a general contest goal the encouragement of new contesters, and avoid making rules that become obstacles to that. 73, /J
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00535.html (8,658 bytes)

62. Re: [CQ-Contest] What is Multi to you? (score: 1)
Author: Jack Haverty <k3fiv@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 17:37:25 -0700
Wow... I was a novice 50+ years ago as KN3FIV, and I do remember Novice Roundups. Lots of fun! It was perhaps the only contest where I ever thought I was actually competing with others just like me,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-05/msg00106.html (14,295 bytes)

63. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is Contesting an e-Sport ? (score: 1)
Author: Jack Haverty <k3fiv@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2017 14:34:31 -0700
Many years ago, I was in the UK on a business trip and turned on the TV. There was a live telecast of a Fishing Tournament. The camera was focused on a fisherman, standing by the edge of a lake. For
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-07/msg00106.html (9,125 bytes)

64. [CQ-Contest] Interesting Youth In Ham Radio Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Jack Haverty <k3fiv@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 17:26:43 -0800
IMHO, it might be helpful to look at Contesting from the "youth perspective", and see what might make it more interesting -- to them. Some obvious characteristics of "youth" (and other casual contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00307.html (11,864 bytes)

65. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW SSB 2017 Effective DQ (score: 1)
Author: Jack Haverty <k3fiv@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 12:47:03 -0800
IMHO, the root problem is that there are multiple types of contesters, ranging from the all-out contest-station go-for-the-gold top-gun entrants to the casual make-a-few-contacts-for-fun masses. Scor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-01/msg00220.html (11,924 bytes)

66. Re: [CQ-Contest] NCJ Article RE: Sweepstakes Change Suggestions (score: 1)
Author: Jack Haverty <k3fiv@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 12:48:32 -0700
Perhaps it's time to consider adding other digital modes to the contest? RTTY has been around for decades, PSK for a while, and newest methods such as FT8 are popular. SS used to be CW and AM; then S
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2018-03/msg00078.html (10,023 bytes)

67. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is there any HTTP cluster streams (not telnet)? (score: 1)
Author: Jack Haverty <k3fiv@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2019 10:29:07 -0700
IIRC, port assignments are just a convention adopted by "the community" back in the 80s. Unless something has changed since I was involved in that fray, there is no enforcement of such conventions. T
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-05/msg00125.html (10,825 bytes)

68. Re: [CQ-Contest] You gotta let me know, should M/M Distributed stay or go. (score: 1)
Author: Jack Haverty <k3fiv@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 13:37:27 -0700
Perhaps it's worth another try at offering a solution....this battle has become the 100 Years War. Instead of "Multi" classifications, consider treating entries involving more than one operator as a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-06/msg00058.html (10,217 bytes)

69. Re: [CQ-Contest] Let's find a better metaphor (score: 1)
Author: Jack Haverty <k3fiv@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 16:34:16 -0700
As humans, we all need some "help" to communicate. By ourselves, we are pretty poorly equipped to handle electromagnetic waves. Our built-in receivers are only able to receive in the 400-700 Terahert
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-06/msg00076.html (14,180 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu