Mail Archive Search: <+from:k4bai@worldnet.att.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:k4bai@worldnet.att.net: 240 ]

Total 240 documents matching your query.

101. [CQ-Contest] New Band Changes Ideas? (score: 1): Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Fri Feb 20 13:32:25 1998; Hi Paul: Your suggestion would give Tech Plus privileges where General Class hams cannot operate (3825-3850). If this were adopted, the Generals should have the use of that 25 khz also. 73, John, K4B; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00227.html (8,186 bytes)
102. [CQ-Contest] Propagation Query (score: 1): Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Thu Feb 26 09:18:03 1998; The skew path propagation that Gary describes is fairly common during marginal conditions on 15 and 20. During low sunspot years, from the southeast often the only JAs we get are on the skew path wit; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-02/msg00297.html (7,835 bytes)
103. [CQ-Contest] contest QSOs (score: 1): Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Mon Mar 9 11:18:52 1998; One type of pile-up management technique that bothers me more than Danny's examples is the failure of the running station to acknowledge the exchange sent to him. Some few think they save time by hit; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00131.html (8,632 bytes)
104. [CQ-Contest] K7FR UBN thoughts (score: 1): Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Wed Mar 18 09:25:27 1998; Good for you, Gary. I hope others will list those stateside stations that caused them to lose mults so that a pattern will emerge. I would think the station managers of those stations would try to se; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00338.html (7,979 bytes)
105. [CQ-Contest] Re: UBN solutions USA/USA QSO's (score: 1): Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Thu Mar 19 09:08:42 1998; Hello Jav: If you are talking about the station who called the one running, the usual reason is that he didn't figure out who he was calling until after the QSO was over. He thought he was calling a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00360.html (7,736 bytes)
106. [CQ-Contest] CQ-WPX..A Modest Proposal (score: 1): Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Fri Apr 3 09:24:39 1998; Hi Barry: Because there are still plenty of guys who will call you for a contact in the WPX contest when you are in the Caribbean (for instance) who will not call for the KQ2 mult. You have a much be; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00045.html (9,206 bytes)
107. [CQ-Contest] Palmyra (score: 1): Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Wed Apr 15 12:33:44 1998; KP6AL is the correct call. 73, John, K4BAI. -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00241.html (8,083 bytes)
108. [CQ-Contest] ATTN: SP Contesters (score: 1): Author: k4bai@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Thu Apr 30 22:53:49 1998; My paper log for this year's SPDX Contest has been returned by the post office marked "retour nexiste plus" from the address published in CQ Magazine and on the LA9HW web page. This is: SPDX Contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-04/msg00397.html (6,089 bytes)
109. [CQ-Contest] post contest log modifications (score: 1): Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Thu Jul 2 16:08:52 1998; One thing I feel strongly about is the second of Bill's situations posted today: getting your club or group together and comparing logs and calls, making corrections and then sending the entry in. Ov; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00021.html (10,685 bytes)
110. [CQ-Contest] checking of scores-ss cw (score: 1): Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Thu Jul 2 17:50:42 1998; With regard to the recent message from NA2N, it seems to me that every contest sponsor should have a firm rule: If log checking reduces an apparent winner's claimed score below that of another entran; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00025.html (7,055 bytes)
111. [CQ-Contest] San Antontio (score: 1): Author: k4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Tue Jul 21 04:14:50 1998; Hello San Antonio: If anyone in the San Antonio area is interesting in meeting to talks contests and DX, I will be in town through Thursday night. I will check e-mail each evening. Messages can be le; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00179.html (6,592 bytes)
112. [CQ-Contest] SIGNING CALLS (score: 1): Author: k4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Wed Jul 22 23:11:31 1998; As the unnamed partner of W4AN at WRTC, I agree with Bill that we signed our call always and that is the best thing to do most of the time. Dick probably is right also, that there may be very limited; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00187.html (11,024 bytes)
113. [CQ-Contest] SIGNING CALLS (score: 1): Author: k4bai@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Fri Jul 24 22:24:58 1998; have programmed "R 8P9Z" for years. Some prefer just to send the callsign and I may try that this year, but it lends to some confusion for the guy who gets through on the first call and can't figure; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00200.html (9,624 bytes)
114. [CQ-Contest] post contest log modifications (score: 1): Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Thu Jul 2 16:08:52 1998; One thing I feel strongly about is the second of Bill's situations posted today: getting your club or group together and comparing logs and calls, making corrections and then sending the entry in. Ov; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00303.html (10,744 bytes)
115. [CQ-Contest] checking of scores-ss cw (score: 1): Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Thu Jul 2 17:50:42 1998; With regard to the recent message from NA2N, it seems to me that every contest sponsor should have a firm rule: If log checking reduces an apparent winner's claimed score below that of another entran; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00305.html (7,061 bytes)
116. [CQ-Contest] San Antontio (score: 1): Author: k4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Tue Jul 21 04:14:50 1998; Hello San Antonio: If anyone in the San Antonio area is interesting in meeting to talks contests and DX, I will be in town through Thursday night. I will check e-mail each evening. Messages can be le; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-07/msg00389.html (6,549 bytes)
117. [CQ-Contest] INNOVATIVE IDEA?? (score: 1): Author: k4bai@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Sun Aug 2 16:09:27 1998; as I miss that family day (and our anniversary on Nov 23) almost every year in order to work the contest from the Caribbean. Unfortunately, there is no place to move it that I am aware of that would; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00027.html (9,243 bytes)
118. [CQ-Contest] RE: VK5GN pileup control and Homer (score: 1): Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Mon Aug 3 11:45:16 1998; With regard to entering zones correctly, I am convinced that most operators with computer logging systems do not try very hard to get the zone correct, but will allow the computer default to be enter; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00043.html (8,265 bytes)
119. [CQ-Contest] CQWW scoring change (score: 1): Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Mon Aug 3 11:54:01 1998; Hello all: Bill Fisher is right. I am in favor of the scoring change proposed by Jim Neiger. His example of 8P6J vs 9Y4 is exactly what I have faced in the Caribbean ever since I lost my opportunity; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00045.html (7,388 bytes)
120. [CQ-Contest] DX in NAQP & Sprints (score: 1): Author: K4BAI@worldnet.att.net (John T. Laney, III); Date: Tue Aug 4 11:13:00 1998; Hi Stefan: Thanks for the two QSOs last weekend in NAQP. Yes, DX stations count for QSO Points in ARRL FD. Some of us consider it a contest even though it is not "politically correct" to say so. Sinc; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-08/msg00077.html (7,335 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]