Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k4ik@subich.com: 112 ]

Total 112 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] RE: Topband: Re: rm-10352 (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Wed Jan 23 15:48:14 2002
Pat, This is one of the reasons for the proposed rule change. To start screwing around with limits for "three weekends a year" would be an invitation to gut the rule. 157 KHz out of 200 KHz is plenty
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00476.html (10,945 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] Not Another Contest Category (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Mon Jan 28 12:15:03 2002
You have only received more support than opposition because the culture is more supportive of efforts to penalize those who excell instead of encourage those who lag behind. Quite simply, those who
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-01/msg00614.html (9,323 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] RTTY WPX and NA Sprint CW this weekend (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Thu Feb 7 16:59:11 2002
Tell that to the Europeans who are not allowed to operate RTTY above 7050 by the IARU bandplan. Why not keep the sprint activity below 7035 - there is plenty of room below that, particularly for a R
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00057.html (8,530 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] RTTY WPX and NA Sprint CW this weekend (fwd) (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Thu Feb 7 17:31:39 2002
Bill, And only generals can participate in this contest? I haven't noticed contest activity staying out of the Extra subbands in any other contest. There is no reason that Sprint activity couldn't st
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00059.html (9,829 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] RTTY WPX and NA Sprint CW this weekend (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Fri Feb 8 10:38:51 2002
NA Sprints have been around a long time but not on the second weekend of February. It is only since NCJ unilaterally moved Sprint "on top of" CQ WPX RTTY that the issue surfaced. For an ARRL publica
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00069.html (10,370 bytes)

6. [CQ-Contest] RTTY WPX and NA Sprint CW this weekend (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Fri Feb 8 13:31:04 2002
The RTTY Journal web site shows results for RTTY WPX going back to 1995. I don't know when it started ... that time was while I was moving around a lot and generally off the air. A look at the calen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00078.html (9,572 bytes)

7. [CQ-Contest] RTTY WPX and NA Sprint CW this weekend (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Fri Feb 8 15:09:51 2002
Of course the two events have not always been the same weekend (1997 and 1998) It is still bad form to put the "suggested operating frequencies" for a domestic (or North American) contest right on t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00085.html (9,126 bytes)

8. [CQ-Contest] Morons at the NCJ (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Fri Feb 8 21:27:58 2002
What is the possibility of exchanging weekends for the FOC Marathon and CW Sprint? RTTY WPX is between a rock and a hard place since the Mexico International RTTY is the first full weekend of Februa
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00090.html (7,693 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Morons at the NCJ (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Sat Feb 9 17:06:59 2002
The same "too many minor contests" argument could be made for all modes ... with all the QSO parties, Sprints, various national society DX contests, and specialty band contests, I doubt there is a s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00100.html (8,805 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] RTTY sigs down around 7035... (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Mon Feb 11 14:10:55 2002
Everyone on this reflector was warned, in spades, about the conflict on 7030-7040. That area is RTTY in the Region 1 and Region 3 IARU bandplans. When a domestic CW and international RTTY contest ar
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00138.html (8,314 bytes)

11. [RTTY] Re: [CQ-Contest] Morons at the NCJ (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Mon Feb 11 14:36:17 2002
Swapping the sprint weekends is one approach. However, to put the shoe on the other foot, how about exchanging the XE and WPX weekends? This is something the RTTY people can do on their own without
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00139.html (8,048 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] RTTY sigs down around 7035... (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Mon Feb 11 14:05:49 2002
It is definitely not amateur ... the amateur digital activity is generally above 10.130 or so. What you hear on the bottom end of 30 is multi-channel commercial stuff (mostly encrypted). 73, ... Joe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00140.html (8,098 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] NCJ Decision Makers (was something less P.C) (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Mon Feb 11 22:14:12 2002
The problem with the RTTY guys taking break time during the Sprint peak time on 40 is that it is also during some of the best hours for NA to EU on 40. Further the RTTY WPX rules provide double poin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00150.html (8,294 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] B-Low 1.835? (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Sat Feb 23 22:33:04 2002
The ARRL bandplan calls for keeping SSB above 1843, not 1835. The US stations don't belong below 1843 on SSB. Unfortunately, there have been several well known contest US contest ops flouting the ban
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-02/msg00375.html (7,376 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] Another quick UPS question (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Sun Mar 10 11:20:10 2002
The gell cell batteries for APC UPS are available from APC or, more conveniently, places like Batteries Plus, Interstate Batteries, etc. A web search will find dozens of places selling the replacemen
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-03/msg00164.html (10,364 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 23:59:04 -0400
All absolutely true ... but only half the story. In fact all of these things happen with your bank's on-line service - you just don't see them! When you log in, you already have an established accoun
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00395.html (10,923 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:03:51 -0400
The same functionality is available in the COMPLETELY FREE DXLabs Suite. After a contest, export log from CT/NA/TR/WriteLog/N1MM to ADIF and import it into DXKeeper. In DXKeeper, go to the QSL tab, s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00487.html (10,863 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:18:53 -0400
You gentlemen still don't get it ... The "customer oriented solutions" are available in many of the well designed logging programs (e.g., DXLabs/DXKeeper). The only difference between LotW and other
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00490.html (10,731 bytes)

19. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:46:36 -0400
Bill, you still don't understand ... they are the same method. The only difference is where the user certificate resides. Just today I was working on a new e-commerce site. The process to get an SSL
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00509.html (11,423 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:46:55 -0400
Some logging programs are already there ... DXLab/DXKeeper is completely functional (and free). Swisslog and ACLog also handle LotW easily - I understand some other loggers automate parts of the proc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00515.html (9,549 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu