Mail Archive Search: <+from:k4ik@subich.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:k4ik@subich.com: 112 ]

Total 112 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:33:38 -0400; A private reply in this thread stated: The other issue is that the raw log data (ADIF or Cabrillo) does not contain the location information (State/County, grid, ITU/CQ zone, and IOTA as appropriate); /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00517.html (10,569 bytes)
22. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:07:11 -0400; The DXCC program has fought forged QSL cards since nearly the very beginning. One only need have spent time with the late W1CW to have heard some of the stories. There is a story (after Bob's time) a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00528.html (10,332 bytes)
23. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:23:11 -0400; No, it's not proof but sending the "post card" to the ADDRESS in the FCC database and no other address is assumed to be a way to make sure that the person who uploaded the certificate is indeed the l; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00530.html (10,550 bytes)
24. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:06:15 -0400; Banks and financial institutions use high security PKI (longer keys than LotW) for the large, inter-institution transfers. The login/password system is used ONLY for end users who do not know any bet; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00556.html (9,804 bytes)
25. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 23:59:04 -0400; All absolutely true ... but only half the story. In fact all of these things happen with your bank's on-line service - you just don't see them! When you log in, you already have an established accoun; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg00984.html (10,923 bytes)
26. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:03:51 -0400; The same functionality is available in the COMPLETELY FREE DXLabs Suite. After a contest, export log from CT/NA/TR/WriteLog/N1MM to ADIF and import it into DXKeeper. In DXKeeper, go to the QSL tab, s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01076.html (10,863 bytes)
27. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:18:53 -0400; You gentlemen still don't get it ... The "customer oriented solutions" are available in many of the well designed logging programs (e.g., DXLabs/DXKeeper). The only difference between LotW and other; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01079.html (10,731 bytes)
28. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 01:46:36 -0400; Bill, you still don't understand ... they are the same method. The only difference is where the user certificate resides. Just today I was working on a new e-commerce site. The process to get an SSL; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01098.html (11,423 bytes)
29. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:46:55 -0400; Some logging programs are already there ... DXLab/DXKeeper is completely functional (and free). Swisslog and ACLog also handle LotW easily - I understand some other loggers automate parts of the proc; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01104.html (9,549 bytes)
30. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:33:38 -0400; A private reply in this thread stated: The other issue is that the raw log data (ADIF or Cabrillo) does not contain the location information (State/County, grid, ITU/CQ zone, and IOTA as appropriate); /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01106.html (10,569 bytes)
31. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:07:11 -0400; The DXCC program has fought forged QSL cards since nearly the very beginning. One only need have spent time with the late W1CW to have heard some of the stories. There is a story (after Bob's time) a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01117.html (10,332 bytes)
32. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:23:11 -0400; No, it's not proof but sending the "post card" to the ADDRESS in the FCC database and no other address is assumed to be a way to make sure that the person who uploaded the certificate is indeed the l; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01119.html (10,550 bytes)
33. Re: [CQ-Contest] L.O.T.W. (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:06:15 -0400; Banks and financial institutions use high security PKI (longer keys than LotW) for the large, inter-institution transfers. The login/password system is used ONLY for end users who do not know any bet; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-07/msg01145.html (9,804 bytes)
34. Re: [CQ-Contest] No Contest -- CW vs. txt msg'g (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 12:11:27 -0400; Actually, he said he could "type" 160 characters in 57 seconds. The problems with SMS are the difficulty of entering a text message using 12 keys (multiple keystrokes for each character) and the del; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00199.html (8,564 bytes)
35. Re: [CQ-Contest] QSO Penalties (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 22:55:14 -0400; Yes, the three QSO penalty comes from the days of manual log checking. Since it was impossible to cross check every QSO in every log, the sponsors checked the top logs as carefully as possible and s; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00220.html (9,076 bytes)
36. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Rules and the District of Columbia (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 17:24:41 -0400; Eric, Why should DC be a multiplier? If you create a separate multiplier for DC (which is treated as Maryland for WAS purposes), then you need to create multipliers for every Indian reservation, nati; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-05/msg00416.html (9,551 bytes)
37. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Rules and the District of Columbia (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 23:34:46 -0400; Bud, All of KH0-KH9 should be DX and not multipliers for NAQP. 73, ... Joe, K4IK _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00002.html (9,649 bytes)
38. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Rules and the District of Columbia (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 23:50:09 -0400; Ken, CQ World Wide RTTY: DC is considered part of MD Again, if DC is a multiplier every Indian reservation, national park, monument and federal facility should be a separate multiplier. They certainl; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00004.html (10,238 bytes)
39. Re: [CQ-Contest] Principles behind multipliers (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 15:30:47 -0400; Based on this, DC is fully contained within Maryland even though it is separately administered just as Big Bend National Park is administered separately from Texas. In only care as it relates to the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00028.html (9,371 bytes)
40. Re: [CQ-Contest] 2005 Dayton Forum Wrap Up (score: 1): Author: "Joe Subich, K4IK" <k4ik@subich.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 19:16:56 -0400; to which AD1C replied: It also makes the vendors/exhibitors unhappy in that it makes participants in the Antenna/Contest and potentially DX forums less likely to spend time at their booth. Taking a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-06/msg00057.html (9,695 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]