Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k4sbz.stan@gmail.com: 156 ]

Total 156 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 199, Issue 20 (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 11:45:12 -0400
I concur with Jims suggestion about analog and digital categories. It does two things - it puts each in their own category so that they arent competing against each other and it shuts up the grumblin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-07/msg00091.html (8,511 bytes)

22. Re: [CQ-Contest] possible changes for CQ VHF Contest (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 11:26:25 -0400
Whats the big deal? The State QSO parties, FD, and many foreign DX contests separate the modes by category in the same contest. Why cant that work with VHF/UHF? That way CW and phone arent competing
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-07/msg00112.html (23,632 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] possible changes for CQ VHF Contest (score: 1)
Author: Stan Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 14:03:44 -0400
John, Plus, with some SDR rigs such as the Flex-6000 series you can have one panadapter set to one part of the band (e.g., 50.313) while monitoring another part of the band (CW), or another band, at
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-07/msg00115.html (11,011 bytes)

24. Re: [CQ-Contest] WWDIGI Contest Testing... (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 17:17:38 -0400
From a pure contesting perspective, receiving a 73 is not a requirement for making a contact. The 73 is a curtesy. W9ET has done his part and is correct in moving on. Why should he have to slow down
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-07/msg00139.html (9,181 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW-Digi Contest -- Rule Clarification (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 13:20:51 -0400
Jeff Clark, <<Now that I've reached 100 countries I'm starting to get bored with it.>> Hang in there, Jeff. It starts getting challenging at about 120. The you have to start using some DXer skills, s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-08/msg00066.html (9,694 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX CW Contest in QST (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 12:38:55 -0400
I think I read in the editorial that they were cutting back to reporting Top Scores in QST with the lengthy discussion on-line at the website. Stan, K4SBZ "Real radio bounces off the sky." __________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-08/msg00174.html (10,251 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] Makrothen - An Exercise In Frustration (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 17:47:39 -0400
Jim, I agree with you. I think the problem is that too many contesters only participate in the big ones: ARRL, CQ and NAQP. Theres a lot of fun in the minor contests mostly non-US DX contests and the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-10/msg00028.html (9,292 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Makrothen - An Exercise In Frustration (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2019 17:58:13 -0400
BTW, note the following from W4CU in less than 3 hours. Stan, K4SBZ Makrothen RTTY Contest - 2019 Call: W4CU Operator(s): W4CU Station: W4CU Class: SO/Single Xcvr HP QTH: FL Operating Time (hrs): 2.8
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-10/msg00029.html (9,880 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Scary (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 13:03:51 -0500
I invited a rookie to my station last year. We couldnt find very many participants. It made a bad impression. Stan, K4SBZ "Real radio bounces off the sky." ___________________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-11/msg00026.html (14,794 bytes)

30. [CQ-Contest] OpTime in 3830 (score: 1)
Author: Stan Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:57:52 -0500
I would like to recommend that everyone enter their Op Hours in 3830. When comparing scores, it is nice to know whether the op attained that score with 10 or 20 hours. Or who got what scores with the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-11/msg00126.html (6,728 bytes)

31. [CQ-Contest] Posting Op Hours on 3830Scores (score: 1)
Author: Stan Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 15:05:13 -0500
I would like to recommend that everyone enter their Op Hours in 3830Scores. When comparing scores, it is nice to know whether the op attained that score with 10 or 20 hours. Or who got what scores wi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-12/msg00050.html (6,721 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Story of Online QSLs (score: 1)
Author: Stan Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 13:39:27 -0500
I use electronic QCLing almost exclusively. The only paper QSLs I send out are for rare DX that doesn't use LoTW. I will also answer any QSL received, if they provide a return envelop with postage. I
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2019-12/msg00081.html (12,153 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] The legacy of not working dupes (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 11:03:36 -0500
People need to update their mindset about dupes. The do NOT give you a penalty. Also, do not remove dupes from your log.....several contests now state that. Consider....You work Someone, but he logs
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00097.html (15,663 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] New Mult for SS (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 11:20:14 -0500
I am on the East Coast and find that in many contests, among the most difficult to work are states nearby due to propagation. Stan, K4SBZ "Real radio bounces off the sky." ___________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00099.html (10,584 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] FT8 question (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 19:13:10 -0500
Carol, Check the part of the instructions that talks about versions of WSJT-X. N1MM creates another copy of WSJT-X that is different from the usual stand-alone one. Sorry I couldnt reply before the c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00106.html (7,749 bytes)

36. Re: [CQ-Contest] World Wide Digi DX Contest Results (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 15:55:53 -0500
Ed, I am both a RTTY contester and a digital contester. I operated in the ARRL RTTY Contest using FT4. I found that FT4 was faster than RTTY using S&P because I didnt have to wait as long at the pile
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00134.html (13,205 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] World Wide Digi DX Contest Results. (score: 1)
Author: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 16:54:01 -0500
Peter, Good comments. The problem with the NILs is this: If you reply to my CQ, giving an RST and I reply to you with RR and an RST, but I dont hear your RR73......did you send it and I didnt hear it
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00137.html (12,453 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] World Wide Digi DX Contest Results (score: 1)
Author: Stan Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2020 17:58:53 -0500
Ed, <<Interestingly, not one person has answered my question, was the 20 40 hour rate screen watching and mouse clicking for 24 hours fun? Anyone?>> If you read between the lines of my response, you
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00140.html (16,762 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] World Wide Digi DX Contest Results. (score: 1)
Author: Stan Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 13:28:19 -0500
Good thoughts, Tim. The thing is that it is not the computer that actually decides whether or not to log the Q. If the other party sends 73, then the computer will ask if you want to log it. In conte
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00155.html (13,063 bytes)

40. Re: [CQ-Contest] World Wide Digi DX Contest Results (score: 1)
Author: Stan Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 13:43:35 -0500
<<BTW I thought RTTY was a digital mode.>> Yep, it is. I just use "digital" instead of the longer "other digital" phrase. And, since you brought it up, isn't CW digital? Many call it the original dig
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-01/msg00157.html (12,610 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu