There have been many discussions, regarding the accessibility of any/all contest logs/UBN. SCC (Slovenia Contest Club) has the answer! Take a look at: http://lea.hamradio.si/~scc/rtty.html all logs/U
The VT, MN, and DE, State QSO parties, are this weekend. All three have the same exchange for "non" VT, MN, and DE stations. I think all State QSO parties, especially those that fall on weekends with
David Robbins K1TTT wrote: "Or does their so2r category let you tx on 2 bands at once as a s/o" Personally, and I suspect I echo the sentiment on 99% of SO1R....I couldn't care less how SO2R operates
Even though I'm not a "sprinter", just about nothing frustrates me more, that to have to wait, for my exchange/acknowledgement, while a SO2R operator makes, or completes, another contact on the "othe
VE3FH [R] asked: "What about uploading contest logs to lotw or eqsl before the log entry deadline?" Don't think LoTW shows any QSO's until your own log is uploaded? eQSL will show them, as needing to
Barry wrote: "Seems we're getting into that time of year when we start rehashing old arguments again. Maybe SO2R as a separate category and eliminating Packet will be next..." I don't think that a se
No need to choose which forum to attend, as there are no other "conflicting" , contesting/DX, forums scheduled, in this time slot! This is your chance to learn, from some of the best, everything you
The RTTY forum will have two excellent speakers, and I will be sending all the final details, on/about April 20. C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW will see up to DX, no ____________________________________________
John Geiger (NE0P) asked: "What is the best 1 x 2 prefix to have for contesting" Regardless of the prefix, try not get one with the suffix of a "big gun" contester! I get many WRKD B4, when I know th
Aa8r@aol.com wrote: "Every effort should be made to ensure accuracies of the final score. If too many errors are found I will send the log back for corrections." Correcting a log, post contest, IMHO,
No need to choose which forum to attend, as there are no other "conflicting", contesting/DX, forums scheduled, at this time! This is your chance to learn, from some of the best, everything you always
Hopefully it will? I would also like to see XQP organizers "standardize" their exchanges, especially when the XQP's overlap? C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW _______________________________________________ CQ-Con
David Pruett wrote: " Not many other units will deliver a contest-grade 1000W with 160M, and do it in a 44 pound box that can be made to fit into a suitcase." Having just sold an MLA-2500, unless I'm
David Thompson wrote: "I agreed with moving the ARRL section reports out of QST as it took many pages each month and most of us did not know the hams in a distant section and the info was short lived
Larry Schimelpfenig wrote: "So my question is am I correct about how CABRILLO really determines what the multipliers are for North American DX, or has Writelog been historically broken in the Sprints
W2EV wrote: "Do match the sending speed of the slowest QSO participant a. Do respond to a CQ at the same or slower speed b. Do respond to a reply to your CQ at the same or slower speed" Something I h
Tree" <tree@kkn.net wrote: "as a casual operator who gets on as fresh meat on Sunday will enjoy a solid hour or more of all the big guns calling them." And you get to choose which of the "big guns" a
K0HB wrote; "Check variable from year to year" IMHO, unless the "last two digits of the year you were first licensed);" is also "variable", there is no option in the rules for the check to be "variab
IMHO, all of this becomes moot, if, after any/all contest(s), you can look yourself in the mirror, and be convinced that, regardless of the category, you did everything within your power to "observe
Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mts.net wrote: "Since we all agree to be bound by the sponsors' decisions when we enter contests, let's be bound by what they say by not saying anything, shall we?" okie dokie...