- 61. Re: [CQ-Contest] My 2 Cents (score: 1)
- Author: "Stan Stockton" <k5go@cox.net>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:23:27 -0500
- The major problem with the way the thread has gone has to do with the original title. There has NEVER, ever been any notion of leveling any playing field! Everyone knows that for the most part the co
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00253.html (17,620 bytes)
- 62. Re: [CQ-Contest] Level Playing Field - my 2 cents (score: 1)
- Author: Stan Stockton <k5go@cox.net>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:24:36 -0500
- Tom, You have some good thoughts regarding this topic. There are a lot of variables which cannot and should not be messed with. The station and operator are the most important variables and should al
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-06/msg00278.html (13,933 bytes)
- 63. Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposal MPMF Contest (more points more fun) (score: 1)
- Author: Stan Stockton <k5go@cox.net>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 15:46:45 -0500
- Very interesting! The most creative post I have seen. If anyone were to sponsor a new, major contest, I think some of your ideas should be considered. Someone in a previous post mentioned a category
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00026.html (13,534 bytes)
- 64. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX "Leveling, Handicapping, Equalizing" (score: 1)
- Author: Stan Stockton <k5go@cox.net>
- Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 07:27:25 -0500
- Final thoughts/Summary... Distance and path both impact one station's ability versus another in working a target country. The distance may be the same between two stations and that target yet one sta
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00036.html (17,034 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu