Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k5na@bga.com: 44 ]

Total 44 documents matching your query.

41. [CQ-Contest] claiming credit for a KNOWN busted call????? (score: 1)
Author: k5na@bga.com (Richard L. King)
Date: Thu Nov 20 16:08:29 1997
Wasn't there once a rule in SweepStakes that said the two points for each SS QSO was the sum of one point for correctly receiving the data and the other point for correctly sending the data? I don't
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00619.html (9,536 bytes)

42. [CQ-Contest] Re: new categories...neverending debate (score: 1)
Author: k5na@bga.com (Richard L. King)
Date: Thu Nov 20 15:56:59 1997
There are too many categories now and it appears that most of the old ones were created to satisify small groups of people who have influence with the CQWW committee. Who asked for, and got, a QRP 10
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1997-11/msg00620.html (10,733 bytes)

43. K2WI ON ARRL AND CQWW 160 CONTESTS (score: 1)
Author: k5na@bga.com (Richard L. King) (Richard L. King)
Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:27 2005
The difference is PacketCluster. I have used 2 radios for contesting since the early 70s. The 160 meter contests were no exception. The drill is to call CQ and listen with one ear while tuning the s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00210.html (7,876 bytes)

44. 160 Contests (score: 1)
Author: k5na@bga.com (Richard L. King) (Richard L. King)
Date: Fri Aug 12 14:15:37 2005
Here are my (K5NA's) comments on Daive's requirements suggestions: Not good, even though I knew you meant local dusk to dawn. That would give more operating hours to areas further north than need the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1996-02/msg00806.html (11,194 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu