- 1. [CQ-Contest] Re: [NCCC] NS3T's wild accusation (score: 1)
- Author: k6iii@juno.com (k6iii@juno.com)
- Date: Fri Apr 12 19:18:01 2002
- Good solid and reasonable reply, Dave. I saw many of your spots and appreciated them. I too spotted many friends so our NCCC guys could find them; many more than once. I don't see the point ns3t is t
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00132.html (9,821 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CQ-Contest] [NCCC] NCCC Thursday Night Practice Party November9 - NS rules , and 60 Minutes! (score: 1)
- Author: "JerryBliss - k6iii" <k6iii@juno.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2006 18:45:47 GMT
- Hmmmmm... if this is a SSB SS practice, why have you stipulated CW-only? I would think it would be a SSB-only activity. Also a reminder to all hands... note the 100-watt limit for these practice even
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-11/msg00357.html (9,172 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu