Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k6ll@arrl.net: 60 ]

Total 60 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] TS850 serial number question (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:16:50 -0500
-- As far as I know, there are no bad serial number ranges for the 850. I haven't heard about the DDS chips. Here's a good page for 850 problems/solutions: http://n6tr.jzap.com/850repair.html I have
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00299.html (8,014 bytes)

22. [CQ-Contest] Skimmer ultimate setup? (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:08:34 -0500
I'm trying to figure out how CW Skimmer will ultimately physically tie in to an so2r contest setup. Let me propose a straw man, and then you smart guys can whip it into shape. 1. We use the IF output
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00487.html (8,315 bytes)

23. Re: [CQ-Contest] Late to the skimmer party (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 06:50:26 -0500
-- That is EXACTLY the sentiment I expressed about so2r 15 years ago. There's been a lot of water under the bridge since then. At least skimmer won't cost $4000 like so2r did. Dave Hachadorian, K6LL
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00594.html (8,133 bytes)

24. [CQ-Contest] SS CW results available (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:37:04 -0500
Results of the 2007 ARRL SS CW are now available online: http://www.arrl.org/contests/results/2007/sscw.pdf Nice job on the writeup by Kelly, VE4XT. Dave Hachadorian, K6LL Yuma, AZ __________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00145.html (6,639 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sunspots (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:12:42 -0500
I think the first number is the number of sunspot groups, and the second number is the total number of sunspots in all the groups. The minimum number, other than zero, is 11 (one group with one sunsp
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00203.html (8,850 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] (CDE) HamIV Controller (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:39:22 -0500
You might do better posting this on the towertalk reflector. Can you, and did you, calibrate the meter by pushing the CAL button? What is the voltage across terminals 3 and 7? It should be 13 VDC. Th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00336.html (9,300 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] ICE 419 Schematic (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 12:54:38 -0700
You're right. The question comes up every few years, and nobody has ever produced a schematic. If you slide the unit out of the case, you can easily see how it is put together. Basically, there are 6
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00211.html (8,232 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Angle of received signal QUERY (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:38:43 -0700
There's not really a simple answer to this question. The best method of analysis would be to use the program HFTA, which comes with the ARRL Antenna book. Here's a link to the manual: http://www.arrl
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00138.html (9,160 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Malicious Interference during SS (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:01:57 -0800
-- This year I started SS on 14.272. That lasted for about 10 minutes, and then a station came on and complained that my POS radio was splattering a net on 14.275. I told him 3 KHz was more than enou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00398.html (8,362 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] contesting amps (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:46:09 -0800
I also like the AL-1500, although the blower is a little loud when set on HIGH. The amp requires about 50W of drive for full output, so you have plenty of headroom with a 100W output rig, especially
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-12/msg00452.html (10,893 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contester e-mail addresses? (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 05:23:38 -0800
For contesters, a search of the reflector Archives is usually helpful. Here was ns9i's email address listed on his 3830 reflector ARRL 160 Meter score in December 2008: ns9i2016@bayland.net Dave Hach
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-01/msg00246.html (7,694 bytes)

32. [CQ-Contest] practice makes perfect (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>
Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 06:08:57 -0800
An interesting opinion piece by David Brooks, quite relevant to contesting. Contest clubs provide the mentors, and contests provide the practice: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/01/opinion/01brooks.ht
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00000.html (6,275 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] SCP Maintenance (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 12:22:35 -0800
Here's one: http://www.dxatlas.com/MEdit/ _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-05/msg00216.html (7,327 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] writelog on XP (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 10:03:18 -0700
I had trouble using optocouplers. They wouldn't key the rig. I went back to a 2N2222 with 1K in the base lead. I tried all the free programs for LPT keying and couldn't get any of them to work. I did
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00047.html (8,971 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] Optocouplers (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 13:37:04 -0700
Hi Mark, Interesting. Let me see if I can summarize your findings regarding use of optocouplers on LPT ports: 1. Single stage optocouplers draw too much current from the LPT port. 2. Darlington optoc
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-07/msg00051.html (9,234 bytes)

36. [CQ-Contest] signing portable in a contest (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:06:25 -0800
In SSCW this past weekend, ther were at least two stations on the air who gave their callsigns as portable about half the time. This creates a major loophole for duping them, if you log them one way
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00200.html (7,341 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] Is holding QRG's legal? (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <K6LL@ARRL.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:13:12 -0800
I have done this once or twice to take a bathroom break. I never really gave the propriety of the process much thought. I can't really think of a specific rule that it violates. Dave Hachadorian, K6L
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-11/msg00460.html (9,959 bytes)

38. [CQ-Contest] RTTY Sprint tonight (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:38:49 -0700
Just a reminder that the RTTY Sprint is coming up this evening. It's fun in its own crazy way. It's even more fun if you are on a team, competing with other teams. If you would like to join one of th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-03/msg00187.html (6,907 bytes)

39. [CQ-Contest] getscores - rookie roundup (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2010 10:16:07 -0700
I was going to play in the rookie roundup and just tried to log in to getscores after registering. Getscores says "live logging will be available later on Saturday, April 17th, for testing before the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00230.html (6,967 bytes)

40. [CQ-Contest] 7QP Rules interpretation (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Hachadorian" <k6ll@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:39:38 -0700
Below is an interesting exchange between me and K4XU on the 7QP rules. From what I see in N1MM v10.4.7 though, N1MM scores subsequent QSO's as a zero point dupe, even if the county is entered. -- Dav
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-04/msg00413.html (7,955 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu