Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k6ll@juno.com: 97 ]

Total 97 documents matching your query.

41. [CQ-Contest] Band-pass filters -- insertion loss (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (Dave Hachadorian)
Date: Fri May 4 21:08:52 2001
On Thu, 03 May 2001 08:19:05 -0400 Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com> writes: I did a little experiment this evening with my two Dunestar 600 boxes, a wattmeter, and a dummy load. On each frequency, th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00060.html (9,112 bytes)

42. [CQ-Contest] (SUMMARY) RE: Which is Best SO2R Box? (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (Dave Hachadorian)
Date: Mon May 14 20:14:59 2001
On Sun, 13 May 2001 19:40:37 -0400 "Jeff Maass" <jmaass@columbus.rr.com> writes: I believe this comment is incorrect. The person who wrote it was probably thinking of the ZS4TX Super Combo Keyer, als
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00145.html (6,989 bytes)

43. [CQ-Contest] re: checklist (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (Dave Hachadorian)
Date: Thu May 31 20:14:02 2001
Here's mine. Pardon the caps. K6LL CONTEST CHECKLIST SET COMPUTER CLOCK TO EXACT/UTC TIME SET UP COMPUTER FILE, CW MEMORIES, KEYBOARD OVERLAY SIMULATE THREE QSOS ON COMPUTER, THEN ERASE FILE GET PROP
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-05/msg00323.html (7,144 bytes)

44. [CQ-Contest] IC756PRO vs International Radio filters (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Thu Mar 9 14:09:02 2000
I had only a couple of minutes with the PRO at a SCCC club meeting, but found that the narrower (<250) settings of the cw DSP were very usable, with little or no ringing, and the -60 dB points were M
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00113.html (8,280 bytes)

45. [CQ-Contest] Re: Digital Voice keyer (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Mon Mar 13 09:52:29 2000
If you are using TR-Log Logging Software, and have a Soundblastercompatible sound card, SOUNDBLASTERDVP runs as a TSR and fully integrates with the program. It sounds great, and is free of charge. It
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00173.html (8,065 bytes)

46. [CQ-Contest] bullet-resistant phone on sale (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Tue May 2 15:49:48 2000
I see Radio Shack has their mdl 43-591 telephone on sale for $14.99 through May 27. I have found this phone to be highly resistant to RFI. I stockpile a few, and just give one to each neighbor who co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-05/msg00014.html (6,602 bytes)

47. [CQ-Contest] WPX & "whats a tribander?" (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Sun May 7 11:11:17 2000
In 1999, both modes, and 2000 ssb, the high scorer used a KT-34XA at 49' and never operated on 40, 80, or 160. Dave Hachadorian, K6LL Yuma, AZ K6LL@juno.com -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contestin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-05/msg00053.html (7,448 bytes)

48. [CQ-Contest] Re: WPX & "whats a tribander?" (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Fri May 12 08:15:57 2000
More importantly, the second feedline enables the use of two radios during the daytime. Dave Hachadorian, K6LL Yuma, AZ K6LL@juno.com -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Admi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-05/msg00071.html (8,285 bytes)

49. [CQ-Contest] SO2R IS A Separate Entry Class (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Thu Jun 1 12:43:41 2000
On Thu, 01 Jun 2000 04:58:21 PDT "John Crovelli" <w2gd@hotmail.com> writes: Well, here we go again. I agree with John. What is the downside to breaking out SO2R into a separate category, a little mor
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00031.html (9,845 bytes)

50. [CQ-Contest] SO2R a separate category? (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Thu Jun 1 20:11:27 2000
You know it's like deja vu all over again on this subject. Everybody states their opinion, there is no consensus, and after a while it all blows over and nothing happens. I just remembered what seeme
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00044.html (7,650 bytes)

51. [CQ-Contest] Contesting in year 2000? (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Sun Mar 14 19:50:46 1999
On Mon, 15 Mar 1999 23:06:42 +1300 Martin Ellis <jmellis@ihug.co.nz> writes: The year 1972 has the same calendar as 2000, so it should do the job for the contesting crowd if all else fails, with the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00240.html (7,955 bytes)

52. [CQ-Contest] Keying interface (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Sun Mar 28 21:56:26 1999
On Sun, 28 Mar 1999 19:45:37 -0600 (CST) Joe <w0joe@tabby.cooldude.com> writes: The old rigs used a keying voltage of about minus 100vdc. Here's what I did on my old TS-830: View this diagram with a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00347.html (8,512 bytes)

53. [CQ-Contest] New WPX Rules... (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Sun Mar 28 22:45:05 1999
I have never operated the WPX ssb contest in previous years. I decided to operate this year because of the rule change. I think there are quite a few people in the same category, so the contest benef
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00350.html (8,419 bytes)

54. [CQ-Contest] WPX portable prefix question (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Fri Jun 4 08:03:52 1999
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999 17:39:33 -0700 "Andrew Faber" <andrew.faber@gte.net> writes: I think you are correct in stating that this is not specifically addressed in the rules. It's just one of those things
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-06/msg00088.html (8,182 bytes)

55. [CQ-Contest] WPX portable prefix question (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Fri Jun 4 08:03:52 1999
On Thu, 3 Jun 1999 17:39:33 -0700 "Andrew Faber" <andrew.faber@gte.net> writes: I think you are correct in stating that this is not specifically addressed in the rules. It's just one of those things
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-06/msg00251.html (8,203 bytes)

56. [CQ-Contest] dual bandpass filter experiment (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Fri Jul 2 18:04:20 1999
I just ran a little experiment to see what additional attenuation could be obtained from adding a second bandpass filter in series with another one. Transceiver 1 was transmitting about 2 watts into
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00003.html (8,268 bytes)

57. [CQ-Contest] Re: TS-850 sensitivity (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Sat Jul 3 11:03:23 1999
Tom, No bandpass filters? I think they are the real answer. Otherwise, you could do the Separate Receive Antenna Mod for the 850, and add a Radio Shack fast-acting 250 ma fuse in the antenna lead in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00004.html (7,877 bytes)

58. [CQ-Contest] dual bandpass filter experiment (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Fri Jul 2 18:04:20 1999
I just ran a little experiment to see what additional attenuation could be obtained from adding a second bandpass filter in series with another one. Transceiver 1 was transmitting about 2 watts into
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00128.html (8,283 bytes)

59. [CQ-Contest] Re: TS-850 sensitivity (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Sat Jul 3 11:03:23 1999
Tom, No bandpass filters? I think they are the real answer. Otherwise, you could do the Separate Receive Antenna Mod for the 850, and add a Radio Shack fast-acting 250 ma fuse in the antenna lead in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-07/msg00129.html (7,874 bytes)

60. [CQ-Contest] Two-Radio Audio (score: 1)
Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com)
Date: Mon Aug 9 09:43:08 1999
I tried it. For me it was ineffective and distracting. Try bridging the left and right headphone leads with a resistor or pot, about 180 ohms. When your switch is in the al/br position, you will hear
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00071.html (7,819 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu