Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k8cc@comcast.net: 229 ]

Total 229 documents matching your query.

221. Re: [CQ-Contest] what is required of recevied audio, and whay will it show? (score: 1)
Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 04:41:54 -0500
Joe needs to go check again. Just about any modern transceiver that has a sub-receiver utilizes stereo receive audio. In my shack, my FT-1000D and FT-1000MP xcvrs have stereo receive audio. And most
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00229.html (12,412 bytes)

222. Re: [CQ-Contest] WB6D - Improved KT34XAs (score: 1)
Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 23:50:52 -0400
The KT36XA has the same number of elements in the same configuration as the KT34XA with the same boom length. It is not a significantly different antenna. The "upgrade kit" replaces components in the
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-03/msg00295.html (11,422 bytes)

223. Re: [CQ-Contest] Same-Band Dueling CQs Now Prohibited in All ARRL Cont (score: 1)
Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 17:47:14 -0400
That is correct Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00087.html (8,264 bytes)

224. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW LCR's and log scrubbing (score: 1)
Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 17:08:05 -0400
X-QSO is defined in the Cabrillo specification on the WWROF web site, and has been for several years. IMHO, this doesn't belong in the rules. If somebody is going to take a QSO out of their Cabrillo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-04/msg00223.html (35,497 bytes)

225. Re: [CQ-Contest] TH7 Replacement (score: 1)
Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 23:10:47 -0400
Check out the W2PV yagi book or the W2PV Yagi design series in the old Ham Radio magazine. Both of which documented a 4L 20M yagi on a 51' boom with big gain and good pattern. It WAS somewhat narrow
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-08/msg00082.html (10,262 bytes)

226. Re: [CQ-Contest] An alternate SS CW re-invigoration plan (score: 1)
Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 02:04:43 -0500
The bonus points for /N and /T stations in the 10M Contest were dropped several years ago. I know, because I do the log checking and scoring for the 10M Contest and I was directed to remove these bon
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-11/msg00392.html (11,572 bytes)

227. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log what he sends? (score: 1)
Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2017 00:53:43 -0500
Jeff, Do you really need to ask this question? If somebody sends you an exchange that doesnt make sense, ASK FOR A FILL. The logcheckers will probably check your log against what his log claims he se
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2017-12/msg00029.html (8,559 bytes)

228. [CQ-Contest] 2020 MiQP * * * UPDATE * * * (score: 1)
Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 14:26:12 -0400
In light of ongoing concerns about the CoronaVirus pandemic, there will be some rule changes for the 2020 Michigan QSO Party to be held April 18-19, 2020.  In conformance with Governor Witmer's "stay
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-04/msg00026.html (7,261 bytes)

229. [CQ-Contest] 2019 MiQP Scores List (score: 1)
Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 00:33:06 -0400
All MiQPers; A number of you have contacted me, asking when the 2019 MiQP results would be available.  There are a number of reasons for the delay, both personally and in regards to the workload in p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2020-04/msg00083.html (7,741 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu