- 41. [CQ-Contest] SO2R a new category? (score: 1)
- Author: k8cc@mediaone.net (k8cc)
- Date: Fri Jun 2 00:34:35 2000
- I fail to see how SO2R is any different from any other station hardware or technology improvement. Should we have a "no beverage antenna" category? How about a "no automatic band or antenna switching
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00043.html (9,382 bytes)
- 42. [CQ-Contest] SO2R (score: 1)
- Author: k8cc@mediaone.net (k8cc)
- Date: Sat Jun 3 02:40:01 2000
- I wish this thread about SO2R would just go away. Nobody has really contributed anything new to the discussion since it started. Everything said has been just someone's opinion - certainly valid, but
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00086.html (9,401 bytes)
- 43. [CQ-Contest] Sleep deprevation (score: 1)
- Author: k8cc@mediaone.net (k8cc)
- Date: Sat Dec 4 15:48:22 1999
- The key, I believe, to being able to get that pre-contest nap is having everything else ready to go so that there is nothing else to do but take the nap. One of my former managers at work used to say
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00027.html (8,997 bytes)
- 44. [CQ-Contest] Intimidating CW Speeds? (score: 1)
- Author: k8cc@mediaone.net (k8cc)
- Date: Thu Dec 9 17:17:16 1999
- "Want to try CW in the 10-Meter Contest, but shy away because it seems like everyone is sending at 35 WPM? There is a solution for operators who want to run CW at less than 20 WPM. During the contest
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00069.html (7,645 bytes)
- 45. [CQ-Contest] Stew You (score: 1)
- Author: k8cc@mediaone.net (k8cc)
- Date: Tue Dec 21 18:44:07 1999
- On the subject of power multipliers, old timers will remember that SS originally was one big competition with a 1.25 power multiplier for 100W stations on CW, and 1.5 on phone. Any contest with power
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-12/msg00225.html (7,689 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu