Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k9ma@sdellington.us: 190 ]

Total 190 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [CQ-Contest] CW Open and the RBN (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 10:00:58 -0500
I wonder if those whose calls were mis-decoded were not looking at spots. (Even though there is no unassisted category in the CWops Open.) Perhaps those who plan to operate unassisted in other contes
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-09/msg00012.html (8,775 bytes)

142. Re: [CQ-Contest] Soundproofing? (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 18:29:22 -0500
That's the key: Put lots of mass in the way of the sound. 73, Scott K9MA -- Scott K9MA k9ma@sdellington.us _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contestin
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00046.html (7,565 bytes)

143. Re: [CQ-Contest] UPDATE: CQ WW DX SSB Midwest vs East Coast (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 13:04:40 -0600
The results of one contest really don't tell you anything. Propagation is just too variable. One of the biggest factors in DX contests is how close the path goes to the magnetic pole. If you play aro
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00132.html (8,746 bytes)

144. Re: [CQ-Contest] Working Split in Contests (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2021 20:39:17 -0600
Actually, we need two new Q-signals: "Spread out, so you aren't all zero beat with each other" and "You're so far off my frequency you're right on top of the station calling CQ next door" 73, Scott K
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-11/msg00151.html (10,668 bytes)

145. Re: [CQ-Contest] Receiver adjustments in CW contest conditions (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 23:53:50 -0700
I generally set the bandwidth to 400 Hz, and pitch to 500. If bad QRM captures the AGC, I'll reduce the bandwidth to 250. However, if AGC capture isn't the issue, I find that reducing the bandwidth r
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-12/msg00106.html (10,105 bytes)

146. Re: [CQ-Contest] Receiver adjustments in CW contest conditions (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2021 23:31:13 -0600
When I'm running with the K3, and adjacent QRM starts to move in, I find that narrowing the passband is often very effective, sometime just going from 400 to 350 Hz. I expect this is the same with al
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-12/msg00114.html (12,181 bytes)

147. [CQ-Contest] RAC Winter Contest Log Submission (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 16:46:57 -0600
The robot initially rejected my N1MM Cabrillo logs. It apparently wanted an extra space in the two lines flagged with errors. 73, Scott K9MA -- Scott K9MA k9ma@sdellington.us ________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-12/msg00115.html (6,581 bytes)

148. Re: [CQ-Contest] Low Power Change to ARRL Contests (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 17:51:27 -0600
I suspect that, at the time of the rule change, there were getting to be a lot of solid-state transceivers that put out 100 W. 73, Scott K9MA -- Scott K9MA k9ma@sdellington.us _______________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-12/msg00148.html (9,595 bytes)

149. Re: [CQ-Contest] Scandanvian propagation question (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2022 20:03:06 -0600
I don't know the exact propagation mechanism, but this path from far northern EU to the northern US is very often open. We may experience it more often here in the north-central US, because our geoma
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-01/msg00095.html (11,029 bytes)

150. Re: [CQ-Contest] Scandanvian propagation question (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 12:59:34 -0600
That makes sense. The key is that the path must pass through the auroral zone, but there's no F2 at the eastern end, because it's dark, so the path doesn't extend far south of the auroral zone. 73, S
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-01/msg00102.html (15,124 bytes)

151. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting/Computer glasses? (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 12:29:57 -0600
Years ago, when I started using progressive bifocals, it was clear that they were not good for some activities, including using computers. I just asked my optometrist for 3 prescriptions: reading, co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-02/msg00195.html (10,278 bytes)

152. [CQ-Contest] Enphase Solar System RFI? (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 23:22:38 -0500
My neighbor is installing an Enphase solar system, just 20 meters or so from my antennas. Has anyone had any experience with their RFI performance? 73, Scott K9MA -- Scott K9MA k9ma@sdellington.us __
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-05/msg00037.html (6,725 bytes)

153. Re: [CQ-Contest] calculating CW duty cycle (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 14:51:12 -0500
Worst case is probably calling CQ with no replies. For example, my typical CQ takes about 4 seconds, and I listen for 1.8-2.5, depending on the contest. It should be easy to calculate the duty cycle
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-07/msg00053.html (9,551 bytes)

154. [RFI] Enphase Solar System RFI Tests (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 10:47:28 -0500
My next door neighbors recently installed a solar system, with the panels no more than 60 feet (18 m) from my antennas. The primary antenna is a tribander at 70 feet, with a 40 meter rotatable dipole
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-07/msg00077.html (9,082 bytes)

155. Re: [CQ-Contest] Recording contest audio (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 17:55:12 -0600
Audicity can record directly to disk. Otherwise, the Zoom H2N works well. 73, Scott K9MA -- Scott Ellington -- via iPad _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-10/msg00051.html (8,510 bytes)

156. Re: [CQ-Contest] RFI Faucet (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 17:23:45 -0600
See the Part 15 notice in the instructions. (I don't suppose there's an actual sticker on the faucet.) 73, Scott K9MA 73; Mike W7VO -- Scott K9MA k9ma@sdellington.us _________________________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-11/msg00060.html (8,590 bytes)

157. Re: [CQ-Contest] Encouraging Spotting of SSB QSOs in Contests (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 14:47:38 -0600
It would seem that spotting S&P contacts would be beneficial to the unassisted operator. Let them all fight over the station you just worked. The downside, I suppose, is that if everyone does that, t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-11/msg00089.html (10,098 bytes)

158. Re: [CQ-Contest] [cwops] Headphones (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 19:51:52 -0600
Beware Bluetooth latency! 73, Scott K9MA Chris KF7WX CWops #3040 FISTS #21331 Christian. D. Herter, MD, FAAFP, FAWM Fellow of the Academy of Wilderness Medicine Fellow of the American Academy of Fami
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-11/msg00151.html (9,621 bytes)

159. Re: [CQ-Contest] Reciprocity in signal strength (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2023 09:26:26 -0600
That's true, but only part of the story. On the HF bands, receiver noise is almost always negligible, so absolute signal strength doesn't matter much. If your random wire isn't matched, all bets are
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-01/msg00065.html (8,883 bytes)

160. Re: [CQ-Contest] Reciprocity in signal strength (score: 1)
Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2023 15:25:49 -0600
On 1/22/2023 1:11 PM, Jim Brown wrote: Yes, I've long been convinced that many (most?( instances assigned to "one way propagation" are really differences in RX noise, or of propagation from direction
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-01/msg00071.html (9,675 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu