Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:keepwalking188@ac0c.com: 91 ]

Total 91 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [CQ-Contest] Running by the numbers (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2021 11:51:35 -0500
Ria, Can you expand on the better alternatives to running numbers? Curious here... 73/jeff/ac0c alpha-charlie-zero-charlie www.ac0c.com There are better ways than by the numbers. 73 Ria, N2RJ Such as
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-07/msg00030.html (12,335 bytes)

82. Re: [CQ-Contest] : Re: NAQP CW - Rules Changes Needed (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 14:22:37 -0500
I have to wonder how much of a participant change adding this category would actually make.  The argument being made is that guys are driven to an assisted operation due to skill or location or shack
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2021-08/msg00045.html (9,896 bytes)

83. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW RTTY this weekend! - practice sessions? (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 18:06:04 -0500
Chris, Any plan for the practice sessions? 73/jeff/ac0c alpha-charlie-zero-charlie www.ac0c.com In just 2 days, the mother of all RTTY contests, the CQ World Wide RTTYcontest will be underway. I see
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-09/msg00060.html (9,125 bytes)

84. Re: [CQ-Contest] RFI Faucet (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 23:18:39 +0100
Sounds like a GREAT reason NOT to use those things. Touch-activated items have been banned from my QTH for decades now. 73/jeff/ac0c alpha-charlie-zero-charlie www.ac0c.com Or for those of us out in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-11/msg00056.html (11,573 bytes)

85. Re: [CQ-Contest] ergonomic chair for improving BIC time (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 19:57:54 -0600
You can get the Aeron chairs 2nd hand pretty easily in like-new condition.  I've bought a couple of those from National Office Liquidators in Phoenix and they were in perfect condition.  Not cheap us
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2022-12/msg00058.html (11,483 bytes)

86. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW DX Contests (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 21:30:41 -0500
Let's change this question slightly. For the CQ WW RTTY contest where a zone and state are given, and we assume the guy has put in the state correctly but for some reason he's sending the wrong zone,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-09/msg00064.html (10,657 bytes)

87. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW DX Contests (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2023 11:41:46 -0500
Chuck, I think you are right. An experienced guy will get this zone entry right.  And a casual op probably won't tender the log.  So the argument to enter the right zone makes sense. What perked me u
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-09/msg00071.html (13,234 bytes)

88. Re: [CQ-Contest] Endurance UP-Date (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 10:22:00 -0600
I cannot believe the piling on of this guy's page.  I'm pretty sure everyone on this reflector who is interested in this topic is an adult and as such can make their own decisions as to the veracity
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-11/msg00151.html (13,364 bytes)

89. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023 21:21:43 -0600
Bob, Just get on and operate.  RTTY RU is a blast.  Lots of action. Work everyone.  Including the dupes.  Welcome to 2024!  And good luck in the 'RU. 73/jeff/ac0c alpha-charlie-zero-charlie www.ac0c.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2023-12/msg00155.html (8,293 bytes)

90. Re: [CQ-Contest] K0SR Vindicated (Was "2024 ARRL DX CW Raw Scores - Is the LP Winner from MO - REALLY?) (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 23:45:58 -0600
As a frequent serious contester from the Midwest, it's almost impossible to beat the east coast stations on any context where the Q point multiplier scales with continent. As such, I would suggest th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00006.html (10,388 bytes)

91. Re: [CQ-Contest] Unique WPX callsigns worth it ? (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Blaine <KeepWalking188@ac0c.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2024 18:20:52 -0500
This is a great point.  It's relative.  But the world is not swimming in VE9 prefix so you already have a pretty nice call as it sits now.  If you had a K6 or W3, then I would guess the impact would
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2024-03/msg00067.html (10,190 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu