- 1. [CQ-Contest] Old topic - New Wrinkle (score: 1)
- Author: ken.claerbout@equant.com (ken.claerbout@equant.com)
- Date: Thu Jan 23 10:41:10 2003
- I'm probably one of those who meet even the strictest definition of operating from home although I don't regularly participate in SS or NAQP. I operate from my own house, own station, deal with any p
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00280.html (8,504 bytes)
- 2. [CQ-Contest] RE: SO2R (score: 1)
- Author: ken.claerbout@equant.com (ken.claerbout@equant.com)
- Date: Mon Jan 27 10:09:13 2003
- Because it's easier to do than actually going out and working to improve ones self. The latter involves work. Ken K4ZW
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00410.html (8,524 bytes)
- 3. [CQ-Contest] RE: SO2R (score: 1)
- Author: ken.claerbout@equant.com (ken.claerbout@equant.com)
- Date: Mon Jan 27 10:55:17 2003
- The idea behind adding a second radio is to improve ones score. While Dave may be right that you will eventually wind up with a configuration like he has outlined, the objective can be met with much
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00413.html (10,845 bytes)
- 4. [CQ-Contest] Consider This (score: 1)
- Author: ken.claerbout@equant.com (ken.claerbout@equant.com)
- Date: Tue Apr 23 14:27:10 2002
- At the risk of beating a horse that has assumed room temperature a long time ago, Randy (K5ZD) is absolutely right. There are far more variables involved than just SO1R vs SO2R. Do we also start sepa
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-04/msg00311.html (11,563 bytes)
- 5. [CQ-Contest] Monster antennas (score: 1)
- Author: ken.claerbout@equant.com (ken.claerbout@equant.com)
- Date: Fri May 10 16:15:28 2002
- Ford - careful. I understand there is a push by some to create a new category for people who use monster antennas as opposed to those use something less. ;-) "Comparing a station with a beam and a di
- /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2002-05/msg00108.html (7,778 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu