Mail Archive Search: <+from:kg2au@stny.lrun.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:kg2au@stny.lrun.com: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] NCJ CTT&T Topic - Motivation (score: 1): Author: kg2au@stny.lrun.com (Jimmy Weierich); Date: Tue Mar 10 18:51:54 1998; Gary, I'm a very little pistol (100 watts, low wires and a multi-band vertical) who has been contesting for three years. A year ago I was beginning to get discouraged about my progress. There were a; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00157.html (16,044 bytes)
2. [CQ-Contest] WRONG! (No matter how you do it, I still lose!) (score: 1): Author: kg2au@stny.lrun.com (Jimmy Weierich); Date: Sat Mar 21 20:07:39 1998; Wouldn't intentionally not logging ANY QSO permitted under the rules, which would result in the loss of points to another station, be a clear violation of the intent of the rules? Regardless of the r; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-03/msg00397.html (7,367 bytes)
3. [CQ-Contest] QSO B4... NO YOU DIDN'T! (score: 1): Author: kg2au@stny.lrun.com (Jimmy Weierich); Date: Fri Dec 11 23:49:43 1998; snip. . . What if you (the CQer) are REALLY not in the other ops (the S&Per) log? What if he was working someone else, or needed a fill on your exchange and you went on to the next caller and he cou; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/1998-12/msg00067.html (11,528 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]