Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ki9a@aol.com: 182 ]

Total 182 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [CQ-Contest] Field Day & CW & 15 minute rule (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:26:00 EDT
I agree...but I also wonder how this is enforced, since you don't submit a log for FD, just a dupe sheet! 73-Chuck KI9A _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Cont
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-06/msg00319.html (7,806 bytes)

22. [TowerTalk] Yaesu G-450A schematic? (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 19:51:05 EDT
Hey gang, Does anybody have a copy of a schematic for a yaesu g-450a rotor?? Thanks! 73-Chuck KI9A _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-07/msg00081.html (6,902 bytes)

23. [CQ-Contest] FT-1000D vs FT-1000MP Mark V (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:29:05 EDT
Hey gang i just stumbled across a nice FT-1000, with all of the D options for a decent price, & was thinking about turning it around for a new 1000MP mark V. What are the differences, & which would b
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-07/msg00173.html (7,013 bytes)

24. [CQ-Contest] Illinois QSO party (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 19:25:57 EDT
Just a reminder of the ILQP Sunday from 1800z-0200z. It looks like all 102 counties wil lbe on. Rules, ect can found on http://my.core.com/~jematz/rams.html Hope you guys get on & help us propagation
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-10/msg00092.html (6,794 bytes)

25. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww ssb spotting report (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 19:11:32 EST
That is right,Stu..But.... How do know if someone is running illegal power? How do you know if someone has a cluster running in the backround & entering UA? Actually, how can you PROVE this has happe
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00046.html (10,208 bytes)

26. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww ssb spotting report (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 06:57:42 EST
So do I! Don't get confused with my post about power/cluster watching. I appreciate Daves efforts to try & make a dent into cheating exposure, but, I think we, as a contest community, should be addre
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00057.html (9,557 bytes)

27. Re: [CQ-Contest] cqww ssb spotting report (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 16:00:47 EST
True, & I recall that a couple of years ago. But, think about it...these goofs that were caught must have nailed dang near EVERY spot, just as soon as it was posted. A "creative" cheater could do thi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00083.html (11,380 bytes)

28. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheerleaders (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 17:30:42 EST
There is one major flaw Ken, at what point will be "allowed" to spot someone? Once? Twice? Once per band? How about the ARRL 10 contest, once per mode? 5 times? What? What if I signed on with a fake
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00187.html (10,728 bytes)

29. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheerleaders (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 17:20:51 EST
Does this mean the single op's listed on page 29 of the NOV/DEC NCJ should be reclassified as multi's?? (If you don't get NCJ, it is DX Contest activity announcements) Arguing what is "ethical" in co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00233.html (10,069 bytes)

30. Re: [CQ-Contest] SPOTTING/ Cheerleading (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 17:41:17 EST
Correct! I do "cheerlead" my pals in the contest club, no doubt. But, I also "cheerlead" op's in different clubs, that I know are FB ops, & deserve a cheer (spot) now & then...just as fans for the ho
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00266.html (7,894 bytes)

31. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheerleaders (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 17:44:16 EST
And, where do you draw the line? 1 spot? 2?? Matbe you can't spot anyone in your club, state, anyone who you may or may not have ever worked in a previous contest?? Can't be enforced... Next issue? C
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00267.html (9,681 bytes)

32. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheerleaders-enforement (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 21:56:15 EST
Ok, so, I make one, than sign on the telnet cluster with a phoney call.... _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00286.html (7,712 bytes)

33. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheerleaders-enforement (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 20:40:09 EST
I would not ever, ever do that..but, a "casual" contester just might, if it saves his pal from getting DQ'ed by having too many folks spot him. If I sign into a telnet cluster (as a casual DXer), ass
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00317.html (7,918 bytes)

34. Re: [CQ-Contest] Not reading UBN reports (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 20:44:53 EST
This is a great issue also...wonder how many guys get dinged by NOT copying the correct call when it shows up on the bandmap? Looks like a double edged sword here! ;-) 73-Chuck KI9A _________________
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00318.html (7,465 bytes)

35. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Rules (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 19:45:25 EST
Is it the stations year licensed, or the op's year licensed? 73-Chuck _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mai
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00555.html (8,806 bytes)

36. [CQ-Contest] SS Phone (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 23:29:05 EST
Did anyone notice how many first timers where on this year? I have a list of 12 guys that are newly licensed, & have never made a contest Q until I walked them thru it. For one, I was his 1st HF QSO.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00564.html (7,458 bytes)

37. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Intentional QRM (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 18:26:25 EST
C'mon Mal, share his name with us! It can't be top secret! 73-Chuck _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00670.html (7,507 bytes)

38. Re: [CQ-Contest] Here we go again (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 19:31:01 EST
Yes, and not everyone can afford to build multi tower antenna systems, but, that doesn't stop me from sending logs in...I understand I don't have a chance against larger stations, but, I do have a ch
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00673.html (9,396 bytes)

39. Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R Again (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 19:54:52 EST
True! I started using an ICOM 728 as a second radio, along with a simple 40m dipole. I now use an ICOM 746, & a FT1000mp field. I can switch between a couple of dipoles, small yagi or vertical. The h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00676.html (7,992 bytes)

40. [CQ-Contest] micro-ham usb/Yaesu (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 20:21:12 EST
Hey gang I just sold my ft1000 & bought a new ft 1000 MK V. I have the micro-ham usb combo rig control/cw interface (which I really like), & was wondering if anyone knows if I can adapt this unit (FT
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00677.html (6,832 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu