Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kk@cg.yu: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [CQ-Contest] receiver measurement (score: 1)
Author: kk@cg.yu (kk)
Date: Sat Mar 11 14:32:33 2000
Being no electronic engineer here (an architect), I wonder what = equipment is required to make those DR, IP and other measurements on = receivers? There is RohdeSchwarz Polyscope, Advantest Spectrum
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00142.html (6,534 bytes)

2. [CQ-Contest] WPX rules (score: 1)
Author: kk@cg.yu (kk)
Date: Mon Mar 13 21:35:21 2000
This is the way CQ WPX rules are published, concerning MUlti op class. Does this mean that Multi SIngles are NOT required to be within 500m boundaries, and that they are allowed MORE than one running
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00183.html (6,873 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] "LAST 2" -Last One (score: 1)
Author: kk@cg.yu (V.Kecman)
Date: Thu Mar 30 06:38:55 2000
Whole calsign should be given. Partial calls do not help on the receive end, nor make things faster. The only technique I heard speeding up rate was 4U1UN operated by K2GM. He used Last Letter One Ti
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-03/msg00301.html (6,432 bytes)

4. [CQ-Contest] When and why did rules change? (score: 1)
Author: kk@cg.yu (V.Kecman)
Date: Sat May 6 21:21:35 2000
Tribander should be defined better than just single feedline. Force12 has their 49ft boom C49XR, and no way that any A3 can compare to that antenna. How are you guys, getting ready for penalties in W
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-05/msg00049.html (7,860 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] HG1S , Deleted records (score: 1)
Author: kk@cg.yu (k)
Date: Fri Jun 9 16:27:51 2000
I wonder, what would look like the World Records listing today, if all records established by breaking rules would be deleted? And the reasons for deleting them are: 1. Excessive power. 2. Two signal
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00183.html (6,906 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu